ArticleCureus2024
A Study of High-Resolution Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings in Shoulder Joint Pain at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Central India.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Development and external validation of a musculoskeletal ultrasound-based prediction model for limited shoulder range of motion in nursing staff with neck-shoulder pain: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Comparison of MRI and High-Resolution USG in Evaluating Patients With Rotator Cuff Pathologies.Cureus · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective This study aims to investigate the diagnostic efficacy of high-resolution ultrasound (USG) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with shoulder joint pain at a tertiary care hospital in Central India. Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted at Acharya Vinoba Bhave Rural Hospital from 2021 to 2024. The study population consisted of patients with shoulder pain, without fractures, who were evaluated using USG and MRI. Participants with infective arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, previous shoulder surgery, or contraindications for MRI were excluded. Data were recorded and analyzed using Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Washington) and R 4.2.0 software (The R Foundation, Vienna, Austria). Sensitivity, specificity, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to compare the diagnostic performance of USG and MRI. Results A total of 80 patients were included, with 49 (61%) males and 31 (39%) females. The MRI findings showed supraspinatus partial tears in 44 (55%) cases, complete tears in 10 (12.5%), and various other shoulder pathologies. USG detected supraspinatus partial tears in 16 (19.5%) and complete tears in seven (8.8%). Kappa statistics indicated moderate to high agreement between USG and MRI for several pathologies, with near-perfect agreement for complete tears. Conclusion High-resolution USG is a valuable tool for the initial assessment of shoulder joint pain, providing reliable diagnostic information with high agreement levels with MRI for complete tears and certain shoulder conditions. MRI remains indispensable for comprehensive evaluation, particularly for partial tears and complex pathologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.