ArticleBone reports2024
Gingival fibroblasts produce paracrine signals that affect osteoclastogenesis in vitro.
Article in Bone reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Osteogenic differentiation of gingival and periodontal ligament fibroblasts inhibits osteoclast formation in 2D and 3D fibrin cultures.Bone reports · 2026Article
- Periodontium-derived fibroblasts as a model to evaluate inflammation and pharmacological modulation of osteogenesis and osteoclast formation.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In periodontitis, gingival fibroblasts (GF) appear to produce a multitude of paracrine factors. However, the influence of GF-derived soluble factors on osteoclastogenesis remains unclear. In this case study, production of paracrine factors by GF was assessed under inflammatory and non-inflammatory conditions, as well as their effect on osteoclastogenesis. Human primary GF were cultured in a transwell system and primed with a cocktail of IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α to mimic inflammation. GF were co-cultured directly and indirectly with human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). Cytokines and chemokines in supernatants (flow cytometry based multiplex assay), osteoclastogenesis (TRAcP staining) and gene expression (qPCR) were quantified on days 7 and 21. Results from this case study showed that GF communicated via soluble factors with PBMC resulting in a two-fold induction of osteoclasts. Reversely, PBMC induced gene expression of IL-6, OPG and MCP-1 by GF. Remarkably, after priming of GF with cytokines, this communication was impaired and resulted in fewer osteoclasts. This could be partly explained by an increase in IL-10 expression and a decrease in MCP-1 expression. Intriguingly, the short priming of GF resulted in significantly higher expression of inflammatory cytokines that was sustained at both 7 and 21 days. GF appear to produce paracrine factors capable of stimulating osteoclastogenesis in the absence of physical cell-cell interactions. GF cultured in the presence of PBMC or osteoclasts had a remarkably inflammatory phenotype. Given profound expression of both pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines after the inflammatory stimulus, it is probably the effector hierarchy that leads to fewer osteoclasts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.