ArticleEuropean journal of haematology2025
Venetoclax Combined With FLAG-IDA in Refractory or Relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia.
Article in European journal of haematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of venetoclax plus azacitidine based regimens in the treatment of relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of hematology · 2025Pooled it
- Review
- Real-World Pharmacokinetic and Exposure-Response Characterization of Venetoclax in Chinese Patients with Hematological Malignancies.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Article
- Addition of hydroxyurea (hydroxycarbamide) enhances the efficacy of fludarabine/cytarabine-based salvage regimens against acute myeloid leukaemia.British journal of haematology · 2025Article
- Article
- Chidamide in Combination With DCAG With or Without Venetoclax for Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe prognosis of patients with refractory or relapsed AML (R/R-AML) is very limited. To (re)achieve complete remission, there has recently been increasing evidence that the combination of venetoclax (VEN) with chemotherapy is associated with improved outcomes. PATIENTS AND
methodsOur retrospective, single-center study of 53 R/R-AML patients with a median follow-up time of 11.0 months compared standard salvage chemotherapy (FLAG-Ida or HAM in n = 35 patients) with a combination of venetoclax (VEN) and FLAG-Ida (FLAVIDA in n = 18 patients) concerning safety and efficacy.
resultsRegarding the primary endpoints, there was a statistically significant increased event free survival (EFS) in the FLAVIDA group compared to patients with standard chemotherapy based on the univariate log-rank-test and in the multivariate Cox regression analysis (HR 0.22 [95% CI 0.05, 0.97]). There were no differences between the two groups in terms of patients developing febrile neutropenia CTCAE III° and IV° or a delay in hematological recovery. In addition, a clear trend towards an improved overall response rate (78% vs. 51%) was demonstrated in the FLAVIDA group.
conclusionsThe FLAVIDA regimen represents a promising treatment alternative for R/R AML patients with a high response rate and significantly improved EFS compared to standard chemotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.