Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39252497›Full record

ArticleNursing open2024

Internationally qualified nurses' perspectives on transitioning specialty skills within Australia: A content analysis.

Chanchal Kurup, Adam Scott Burston, Vasiliki Betihavas, Elisabeth Ruth Jacob

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chanchal KurupSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0526-2539
Adam Scott BurstonSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1135-3413
Vasiliki BetihavasSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9841-2630
Elisabeth Ruth JacobSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3506-8422

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo explore internationally qualified nurses' perceptions regarding the facilitators and barriers to specialty skill transfer in Australia.

designThe study utilised a descriptive research design with a cross-sectional survey. Data were collected from July to September 2022.

methodsA self-designed survey was distributed through social media, snowballing and nursing professional organisations. The survey included six open-ended questions which were analysed using thematic content analysis.

resultsSixty-three participants completed the open-ended questions in the survey. The findings identified a range of facilitators (support, previous experience, self-agency) and barriers (systems barriers, bias/discrimination, being undervalued, lack of trust) to skill transition.

conclusionRecognising and addressing facilitators and barriers, coupled with creating customised pathways for specialty skill integration, are essential for optimising the utilisation of specialised skills in internationally qualified nurses. IMPACT: This study aims to explore the barriers and facilitators involved in maximising skill utilisation among internationally qualified nurses in Australia. Identifying these barriers and facilitators is essential for improving patient care, as it will guide the development of strategies for safe nursing service delivery and the optimisation of skill usage. These findings hold significant implications for policymakers, healthcare organisations and nurses, providing valuable insights into how to address these obstacles and capitalise on the factors that make skill transfer smoother and more effective. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Sixty-three internationally qualified nurses shared their experiences and opinions.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelAustraliaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNursesNurses, InternationalSurveys and Questionnairesnurse specialtynursing expertisenursing practicenursing workforcepublic policyskill utilisationspecialisation

Identifiers

PMID39252497
PMCPMC11386253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.