Trial reportCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2024
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalating phase IIa trial to evaluate the safety, tolerability, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of multiple oral doses of Pynegabine tablets as add-on therapy in patients with focal epilepsy.
Trial report in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalating phase IIa trial to evaluate the safety, tolerability, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of multiple oral doses of Pynegabine tablets as add-on therapy in patients with focal epilepsy.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2024Trial
- The novel role of GADD45A in the etiology of autism: modulating neuronal excitability via TET1/R-loop dependent regulation of KCNQ5.Molecular psychiatry · 2026Article
- From Retigabine to Azetukalner: Reviving Voltage-Gated Potassium Channels for Epilepsy Therapy.Archiv der Pharmazie · 2026Review
- Targeting Kv7 Potassium Channels for Epilepsy.CNS drugs · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsThis study aims to investigate the safety, tolerability, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of Pynegabine as an add-on therapy in the treatment of focal epilepsy. METHODOLOGY: This is a protocol phase-IIa, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, multicenter study in patients with focal epilepsy from multiple centers in China who have been treated with at least 2 ASMs without effective control. The study involves an 8-week run-in period with stable use of previous medications. Patients are then randomized to receive either Pynegabine or a placebo. Sentinel administration is performed initially, and subsequent patients are randomized based on safety assessments. Three dose cohorts (15, 20, and 25 mg/d) are established. Efficacy is assessed through various measures, including seizure frequency, CGI score, PGI score, HAMA score, HAMD score, MoCA scale score, QOLIE-31 scale score, and 12 h-EEG score. Safety evaluations, PK blood samples, concomitant medications, and adverse events are also recorded.
conclusionData from the study will be used to evaluate the safety, tolerability, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of Pynegabine tablets as add-on therapy for focal epilepsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.