ArticleMedicine2024
Causal relationships between gut microbiota and depression/anxiety disorders: A 2-sample Mendelian randomization study.
Article in Medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Evidence shows that the composition of the gut microbiota (GM) is associated with depression and anxiety disorders. However, the causal relationship between them remains controversial. To investigate the potential causal relationship between the GM and depression/anxiety disorders and to identify specific bacterial taxa, we conducted a 2-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis on the gut microbiome implicated in depression and anxiety disorders. We incorporated summary data from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of the microbiome derived from 7738 individuals in the Dutch Microbiome Project and 18,340 individuals in the MiBioGen consortium as our exposure variable. Concurrently, the GWAS of depression and anxiety disorders was employed as our outcome variable. The principal estimates were procured using the inverse-variance weighted test complemented by 4 robust methods: MR Egger, weighted median, simple mode, and weighted mode. In addition, we performed comprehensive sensitivity and directionality analyses. The results showed that 5 bacterial taxa were positively correlated with depression, 6 were negatively correlated; 5 were positively correlated with anxiety disorders, and 11 were negatively correlated. This study provides new insights into the connection between the GM and the pathogenesis of depression and anxiety disorders and offers new perspectives for the diagnosis and treatment of these disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.