Observational studyMedicine2024
Clinical value of transperineal ultrasound in evaluating the diagnostic grade of rectocele in Chinese women with obstructed defecation syndrome: An observational study.
Observational study in Medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) in diagnosing rectocele, rectal intussusception (RI), enterocele, perineal descent (PD), and cystocele in Chinese women with obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS), and to determine the grading of rectocele via TPUS. Between January 2019 and December 2021, 107 obstructed defecation syndrome patients, with a mean age of 49.76 years, received TPUS and defecation proctography (DEP). Both methods were used to diagnose anorectal angle, rectocele, RI, enterocele, and PD, while cystocele and uterine prolapse were diagnosed only through TPUS. Agreement between DEP and TPUS diagnostic results was compared using Cohen kappa statistics. Seventy-six rectoceles were reported following DEP and 72 after TPUS. DEP detected 7 enteroceles, 6 of which were diagnosed simultaneously by TPUS. 43 patients presented dyssynergic defecation (DD) upon DEP, while 51 upon TPUS. DEP and TPUS detected PD in 13 and 11 patients respectively, and RI in 82 and 73, respectively. Rectocele (kappa = 0.738), RI (kappa = 0.711), DD (kappa = 0.774), enterocele (kappa = 0.847), and PD (kappa = 0.625) were obtained by Cohen kappa statistics, which indicated a good agreement between DEP and TPUS. The cutoff values for the diagnosis of moderate and severe rectocele with TPUS were 12.05 mm (AUC: 0.941) and 18.50 mm (AUC: 0.977), respectively. The DEP-determined and TPUS-determined anorectal angles were significantly correlated in the resting and Valsalva states (P < .01). Compared with DEP, while maintaining good agreement in detecting rectocele, RI, DD, enterocele, and PD, TPUS is a repeatable and noninvasive alternative. Threshold values of 12.05 mm and 18.50 mm on TPUS may diagnose moderate and severe rectocele, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.