ArticleBMC nephrology2024
Efficacy and safety of oral cyclophosphamide versus mycophenolate mofetil in childhood nephrotic syndrome: an open-label comparative study.
Article in BMC nephrology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immune dysregulation in pediatric cancer-associated nephrotic syndrome: current insights.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Review
- Effectiveness of Mycophenolate Mofetil Trough Level Monitoring in Children with Relapsing Nephrotic Syndrome.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThere is a scarcity of research comparing the efficacy of cyclophosphamide and mycophenolate mofetil in childhood nephrotic syndrome. The aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral cyclophosphamide (CYC) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome in terms of the proportion of children who have been off steroids for at least 6 months without proteinuria (responders).
methodsThis open-label retrospective-prospective comparative study was conducted in a pediatric nephrology clinic of a referral center for children between 1 and 18 years of age with FR/SD nephrotic syndrome. Group A consisted of patients who received oral cyclophosphamide (100, 25% female) at a dose of 2-2.5 mg/kg once daily for a period of 8-12 weeks. Group B consisted of patients who received oral mycophenolate mofetil (n = 61, 18% female) (dose: 800-1200 mg/m2) for at least 12 months. Responders were defined as children who were off steroids for at least 6 months along with absence of proteinuria.
resultsIn the CYC group, 50% of the patients were responders, whereas 54% of the patients in the MMF group were responders (p = 0.614). The time to first relapse with CYC was 7 months (IQR 5.25-11) compared to 7 months (IQR 3.5-12) with MMF (p = 0.092). The relapse rate in the CYC group was 1.77 relapses per patient-year compared to 1.295 relapses per patient-year in the MMF group. The difference in relapse rate was significant (-0.474; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.86 relapses/person-year) (p value = 0.009). Multivariate analysis revealed that an age of less than 5 years at the start of treatment was a significant factor for a better response to MMF (p value = 0.039, OR = 2.988, CI -1.055-8.468).
conclusionsThe efficacy of MMF was similar to that of CYC in terms of response (6 months without steroids) in children with FR/SD nephrotic syndrome. MMF showed a favorable response in terms of the frequency of relapse and treatment failure. REGISTRATION OF THE STUDY WITH CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY OF INDIA: ( http://ctri.nic.in ;CTRI/2021/06/034421) (Dt: 28/06/2021).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.