Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39251921›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2024

Combining propensity score methods with variational autoencoders for generating synthetic data in presence of latent sub-groups.

Kiana Farhadyar, Federico Bonofiglio, Maren Hackenberg, Max Behrens, Daniela Zöller, Harald Binder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Population health management fit lifecycles in analytics.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kiana FarhadyarInstitute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. kiana.farhadyar@uniklinik-freiburg.de.
Federico BonofiglioNational Research Council of Italy, ISMAR, Forte Santa Teresa, Lerici, Italy.
Maren HackenbergInstitute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Max BehrensInstitute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Daniela ZöllerInstitute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Harald BinderInstitute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) 499552394
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In settings requiring synthetic data generation based on a clinical cohort, e.g., due to data protection regulations, heterogeneity across individuals might be a nuisance that we need to control or faithfully preserve. The sources of such heterogeneity might be known, e.g., as indicated by sub-groups labels, or might be unknown and thus reflected only in properties of distributions, such as bimodality or skewness. We investigate how such heterogeneity can be preserved and controlled when obtaining synthetic data from variational autoencoders (VAEs), i.e., a generative deep learning technique that utilizes a low-dimensional latent representation. To faithfully reproduce unknown heterogeneity reflected in marginal distributions, we propose to combine VAEs with pre-transformations. For dealing with known heterogeneity due to sub-groups, we complement VAEs with models for group membership, specifically from propensity score regression. The evaluation is performed with a realistic simulation design that features sub-groups and challenging marginal distributions. The proposed approach faithfully recovers the latter, compared to synthetic data approaches that focus purely on marginal distributions. Propensity scores add complementary information, e.g., when visualized in the latent space, and enable sampling of synthetic data with or without sub-group specific characteristics. We also illustrate the proposed approach with real data from an international stroke trial that exhibits considerable distribution differences between study sites, in addition to bimodality. These results indicate that describing heterogeneity by statistical approaches, such as propensity score regression, might be more generally useful for complementing generative deep learning for obtaining synthetic data that faithfully reflects structure from clinical cohorts.

Indexed as

Propensity ScoreAlgorithmsComputer SimulationDeep LearningHumansComplex distributionDeep generative modelPropensity scoreSynthetic dataVariational autoencoder

Identifiers

PMID39251921
PMCPMC11382494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.