Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39251911›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2024

Primed and ready: nanopore metabarcoding can now recover highly accurate consensus barcodes that are generally indel-free.

Jia Jin Marc Chang, Yin Cheong Aden Ip, Wan Lin Neo, Maxine A D Mowe, Zeehan Jaafar, Danwei Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jia Jin Marc ChangDepartment of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, 16 Science Drive 4, Singapore, 117558, Singapore. jjmc@u.nus.edu.
Yin Cheong Aden IpDepartment of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, 16 Science Drive 4, Singapore, 117558, Singapore.
Wan Lin NeoDepartment of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, 16 Science Drive 4, Singapore, 117558, Singapore.
Maxine A D MoweDepartment of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, 16 Science Drive 4, Singapore, 117558, Singapore.
Zeehan JaafarDepartment of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, 16 Science Drive 4, Singapore, 117558, Singapore.
Danwei HuangDepartment of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, 16 Science Drive 4, Singapore, 117558, Singapore.

Funding

National Parks Board - Singapore A-0008413-00-00National Research Foundation Singapore MSRDP-P18
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDNA metabarcoding applies high-throughput sequencing approaches to generate numerous DNA barcodes from mixed sample pools for mass species identification and community characterisation. To date, however, most metabarcoding studies employ second-generation sequencing platforms like Illumina, which are limited by short read lengths and longer turnaround times. While third-generation platforms such as the MinION (Oxford Nanopore Technologies) can sequence longer reads and even in real-time, application of these platforms for metabarcoding has remained limited possibly due to the relatively high read error rates as well as the paucity of specialised software for processing such reads.

resultsWe show that this is no longer the case by performing nanopore-based, cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) metabarcoding on 34 zooplankton bulk samples, and benchmarking the results against conventional Illumina MiSeq sequencing. Nanopore R10.3 sequencing chemistry and super accurate (SUP) basecalling model reduced raw read error rates to ~ 4%, and consensus calling with amplicon_sorter (without further error correction) generated metabarcodes that were ≤ 1% erroneous. Although Illumina recovered a higher number of molecular operational taxonomic units (MOTUs) than nanopore sequencing (589 vs. 471), we found no significant differences in the zooplankton communities inferred between the sequencing platforms. Importantly, 406 of 444 (91.4%) shared MOTUs between Illumina and nanopore were also found to be free of indel errors, and 85% of the zooplankton richness could be recovered after just 12-15 h of sequencing.

conclusionOur results demonstrate that nanopore sequencing can generate metabarcodes with Illumina-like accuracy, and we are the first study to show that nanopore metabarcodes are almost always indel-free. We also show that nanopore metabarcoding is viable for characterising species-rich communities rapidly, and that the same ecological conclusions can be obtained regardless of the sequencing platform used. Collectively, our study inspires confidence in nanopore sequencing and paves the way for greater utilisation of nanopore technology in various metabarcoding applications.

Indexed as

DNA Barcoding, TaxonomicHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingNanoporesAnimalsElectron Transport Complex IVINDEL MutationNanopore SequencingSequence Analysis, DNAZooplanktonElectron Transport Complex IVBiomonitoringIlluminaMinIONNext-generation sequencingSpecies diversityZooplankton

Identifiers

PMID39251911
PMCPMC11382387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.