ArticleEye (London, England)2024
Macular holes with minimal diameter greater than 650 µm close in 85% of cases after vitrectomy and ILM peeling with visual benefit.
Article in Eye (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Short-term visual acuity responder rates after full-thickness macular hole surgery stratified by hole size: a retrospective cohort study.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Versus Conventional Peeling for Idiopathic Full Thickness Macular Holes: A Registry Analysis of 2990 Eyes.Clinical & experimental ophthalmologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo describe the postoperative outcomes of eyes with primary full-thickness macular holes (MH) greater than 650 μm.
designRetrospective, monocentric, consecutive case series.
participantsPatients with primary MH operated at Lariboisière Hospital, Paris, France.
methodsRecords of patients with MH with a minimum horizontal diameter greater than 650 μm that underwent primary surgery with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling (complete or with inverted ILM flap) between January 2010 and January 2022 were reviewed.
main outcome measuresPostoperative MH closure rate and visual acuity.
results74 eyes of 73 patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean minimum horizontal diameter was 777 ± 108 µm (650-1114). It ranged between 650 and 800 µm in 40 eyes (54%) and was ≧ 800 µm in 34 eyes (46%). The closure rate was 77% (57/74) after primary surgery and was significantly higher in MH between 650 and 800 µm, than in MH ≧ 800 µm (87.5% versus 64.7%, p = 0.02). In the 58/74 eyes in which conventional ILM peeling was performed, closure rate was 74.1% (43/58), significantly higher in MH ranging between 650 and 800 µm than in MH ≧ 800 µm (84.8% versus 60.0%, p = 0.03). In closed MH, 50/64 (78%) eyes achieved a VA gain ≥0.2 logMAR (3 lines), and 14 (21.9%) eyes a final BCVA ≥ 0.3 logMAR.
conclusionMH surgery with conventional ILM peeling allowed closed MH ≧ 650 μm and < 800 μm with a success rate close to 85% that decreased in larger MH. A significant visual improvement was achieved after MH closure, even in MH ≧ 800 μm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.