Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39251887›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2025

Effects of early parenteral nutrition on the development of premature infants born at 22-23 weeks of gestation: a retrospective cohort study evaluated by brain magnetic resonance imaging.

Mayumi Tsukayama, Haruna Azuma, Itsuki Oshiro, Hideki Goya, Tomohide Yoshida, Koichi Nakanishi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mayumi TsukayamaMaternity and Perinatal Care Center, University of the Ryukyus Hospital, Okinawa, Japan.
Haruna AzumaDepartment of Child Health and Welfare (Pediatrics), Graduate School of Medicine, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa, Japan.
Itsuki OshiroDepartment of Child Health and Welfare (Pediatrics), Graduate School of Medicine, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa, Japan.
Hideki GoyaMaternity and Perinatal Care Center, University of the Ryukyus Hospital, Okinawa, Japan.
Tomohide YoshidaMaternity and Perinatal Care Center, University of the Ryukyus Hospital, Okinawa, Japan. h034910@med.u-ryukyu.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0003-0110-3397
Koichi NakanishiDepartment of Child Health and Welfare (Pediatrics), Graduate School of Medicine, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe effect of early parenteral nutrition (EPN) therapy on brain development in extremely premature infants at a gestational age (GA) of 22-25 weeks remains unknown.

objectivesThis study investigated the effect of EPN therapy on GA 22 to 25 weeks of gestation using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) global brain abnormality score (GBAS). SUBJECTS: Forty-six preterm infants born before 26 weeks of gestation were divided into the GA 22-23 weeks (GA 22-23; n = 18) and GA 24-25 weeks (GA 24-25; n = 28) group.

methodsEach infant received ≥3.0 g/kg/day of amino acids from day 1 of life and ≥1.0 g/kg/day of lipid emulsion the next day. Weight change during hospitalization, GBAS at discharge, and developmental quotient (DQ) until three years old were compared between the groups.

resultsGA 22-23 showed long-term postnatal weight loss, but weight at 41 weeks of postmenstrual age did not differ between the groups. The GBAS score was not significantly different, but the head circumference was smaller in GA 22-23 than in GA 24-25 until 2 years old. The DQ at 1-1.5 years old was lower in GA 22-23 than that of GA 24-25; however, there was no significant difference in DQ after 2 years old between the groups.

conclusionsThe effect of nutritional support with EPN therapy in premature neonates born at <24 weeks of gestation may still be inadequate. GBAS is useful for assessing brain development in very preterm infants, and the importance of nutritional support during the first few weeks of life should continue to be explored.

Indexed as

BrainGestational AgeMagnetic Resonance ImagingParenteral NutritionChild DevelopmentFemaleHumansInfantInfant, Extremely PrematureInfant, NewbornInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaInfant, PrematureMaleRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.