Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39251878›Full record

ReviewWiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology

Targeting specific brain districts for advanced nanotherapies: A review from the perspective of precision nanomedicine.

Giulia Sierri, Michela Patrucco, Davide Ferrario, Antonio Renda, Susanna Comi, Matilde Ciprandi, Veronica Fontanini, Francesco Saverio Sica, Silvia Sesana, Marta Costa Verdugo and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Tunable soy protein isolate hydrogel for nanoparticles brain release.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. New Trends in Brain Shuttle Peptides.Molecular pharmaceutics · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Giulia SierriSchool of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.ORCID 0009-0002-1025-4103
Michela PatruccoSchool of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.ORCID 0009-0003-1905-3567
Davide FerrarioSchool of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.ORCID 0009-0000-5634-1806
Antonio RendaSchool of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2658-5452
Susanna ComiSchool of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.ORCID 0009-0003-9553-6800
Matilde CiprandiDepartment of Biotechnology and Biosciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Veronica FontaniniDepartment of Life Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.ORCID 0009-0007-8221-6567
Francesco Saverio SicaSchool of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.ORCID 0009-0003-7721-439X
Silvia SesanaSchool of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6651-9468
Marta Costa VerdugoDonostia International Physics Center (DIPC), Donostia, Euskadi, Spain.
Marcelo KraviczSchool of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0341-2516
Luca SalassaDonostia International Physics Center (DIPC), Donostia, Euskadi, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2112-9095
Marta BusnelliInstitute of Neuroscience, National Research Council, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3387-2190
Francesca ReSchool of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1374-567X

Funding

European Union CUP H53D23006320006Italian Ministry of University and Research PRIN 2022YJSMBX"Severo Ochoa" Programme for Centres of Excellence in R&D CEX2018-000867-SSpanish State Research Agency PID2022-139267OB-I00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous studies are focused on nanoparticle penetration into the brain functionalizing them with ligands useful to cross the blood-brain barrier. However, cell targeting is also crucial, given that cerebral pathologies frequently affect specific brain cells or areas. Functionalize nanoparticles with the most appropriate targeting elements, tailor their physical parameters, and consider the brain's complex anatomy are essential aspects for precise therapy and diagnosis. In this review, we addressed the state of the art on targeted nanoparticles for drug delivery in diseased brain regions, outlining progress, limitations, and ongoing challenges. We also provide a summary and overview of general design principles that can be applied to nanotherapies, considering the areas and cell types affected by the most common brain disorders. We then emphasize lingering uncertainties that hinder the translational possibilities of nanotherapies for clinical use. Finally, we offer suggestions for continuing preclinical investigations to enhance the overall effectiveness of precision nanomedicine in addressing neurological conditions. This article is categorized under: Therapeutic Approaches and Drug Discovery > Nanomedicine for Neurological Disease Therapeutic Approaches and Drug Discovery > Emerging Technologies.

Indexed as

BrainNanomedicineAnimalsBlood-Brain BarrierBrain DiseasesDrug Delivery SystemsHumansNanoparticlesPrecision Medicineblood–brain barrierbrainnanomedicinenanoparticlestargeted drug delivery

Identifiers

PMID39251878
PMCPMC11670049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.