ArticleNPJ digital medicine2024
Transatlantic transferability and replicability of machine-learning algorithms to predict mental health crises.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Psychiatry: Five Decades of Progress and Persistent Translational Challenges.Psychiatric research and clinical practice · 2026Article
- Article
- Opportunities and Challenges in Using National EHR Networks for AI in Learning Health Systems.Learning health systems · 2026Article
- A novel interpretable machine learning framework for predicting postpartum depression: a SHAP-based analysis of maternal and infant health indicators.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Model to Predict the Risk of Medical Decision-Making Delay in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients From Multicenter Tertiary Hospitals in China.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
- Optimizing large language models for detecting symptoms of depression/anxiety in chronic diseases patient communications.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Development and Validation of Machine Learning-Based Marker for Early Detection and Prognosis Stratification of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transferring and replicating predictive algorithms across healthcare systems constitutes a unique yet crucial challenge that needs to be addressed to enable the widespread adoption of machine learning in healthcare. In this study, we explored the impact of important differences across healthcare systems and the associated Electronic Health Records (EHRs) on machine-learning algorithms to predict mental health crises, up to 28 days in advance. We evaluated both the transferability and replicability of such machine learning models, and for this purpose, we trained six models using features and methods developed on EHR data from the Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust in the UK. These machine learning models were then used to predict the mental health crises of 2907 patients seen at the Rush University System for Health in the US between 2018 and 2020. The best one was trained on a combination of US-specific structured features and frequency features from anonymized patient notes and achieved an AUROC of 0.837. A model with comparable performance, originally trained using UK structured data, was transferred and then tuned using US data, achieving an AUROC of 0.826. Our findings establish the feasibility of transferring and replicating machine learning models to predict mental health crises across diverse hospital systems.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.