Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39251803›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Assessment of the antibacterial and antioxidant activities of seaweed-derived extracts.

Monika Hejna, Matteo Dell'Anno, Yanhong Liu, Luciana Rossi, Anna Aksmann, Grzegorz Pogorzelski, Artur Jóźwik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Metabolomic Profiling ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Therapeutic Potential of Green Seaweed:Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Monika HejnaDepartment of Biotechnology and Nutrigenomics, Institute of Genetics and Animal Biotechnology of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Postępu 36A, 05-552, Jastrzębiec, Poland. m.hejna@igbzpan.pl.ORCID 0000-0003-3427-9831
Matteo Dell'AnnoDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences-DIVAS, Università degli Studi di Milano, Dell'Università 6, 26900, Lodi, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2171-864X
Yanhong LiuDepartment of Animal Science, University of California, 2251 Meyer Hall, One Shields Ave, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7727-4796
Luciana RossiDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences-DIVAS, Università degli Studi di Milano, Dell'Università 6, 26900, Lodi, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1178-4683
Anna AksmannDepartment of Plant Experimental Biology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology, University of Gdańsk, Wita Stwosza 59, 80-308, Gdańsk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4766-2434
Grzegorz PogorzelskiDepartment of Biotechnology and Nutrigenomics, Institute of Genetics and Animal Biotechnology of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Postępu 36A, 05-552, Jastrzębiec, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3443-4571
Artur JóźwikDepartment of Biotechnology and Nutrigenomics, Institute of Genetics and Animal Biotechnology of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Postępu 36A, 05-552, Jastrzębiec, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5546-9891

Funding

European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant and from the Polish Ministry of Education and Science 847639
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In swine farming, animals develop diseases that require the use of antibiotics. In-feed antibiotics as growth promoters have been banned due to the increasing concern of antimicrobial resistance. Seaweeds offer bioactive molecules with antibacterial and antioxidant properties. The aim was to estimate the in vitro properties of seaweed extracts: Ascophyllum nodosum (AN), Palmaria palmata (PP), Ulva lactuca (UL), and 1:1 mixes (ANPP, ANUL, PPUL). Escherichia coli strains were used to test for growth inhibitory activity, and chemical-based assays were performed for antioxidant properties. The treatments were 2 (with/without Escherichia coli) × 2 (F4 + and F18 +) × 5 doses (0, 1.44, 2.87, 5.75, 11.50, and 23.0 mg/mL). Bacteria were supplemented with seaweed extracts, and growth was monitored. The antioxidant activity was assessed with 6 doses (0, 1, 50, 100, 200, 500, and 600 mg/mL) × 6 compounds using two chemical assays. Data were evaluated through SAS. The results showed that AN and UL significantly inhibited (p < 0.05) the growth of F4 + and F18 +. PP and mixes did not display an inhibition of the bacteria growth. AN, PP, UL extracts, and mixes exhibited antioxidant activities, with AN showing the strongest dose-response. Thus, AN and UL seaweed extracts reveal promising antibacterial and antioxidant effects and may be candidates for in-feed additives.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAntioxidantsEscherichia coliPlant ExtractsSeaweedAnimalsAscophyllumMicrobial Sensitivity TestsUlvaAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntioxidantsPlant ExtractsAntibacterialAntioxidantBioactive compoundsLivestock farmingSeaweeds extracts

Identifiers

PMID39251803
PMCPMC11383966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.