Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39251718›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Critical assessment of furrow openers and operational parameters for optimum performance under conservation tillage.

B S Madhusudan, H L Kushwaha, Adarsh Kumar, Roaf Ahmad Parray, Sidhartha Sekhar Swain, Manojit Chowdhury, Ramineni Harsha Nag, K R Asha, Sunil Kumar Rathod, Pradeep Kumar and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

B S MadhusudanDepartment of Agricultural Engineering, REVA University, Bengaluru, 560064, India.
H L KushwahaDivision of Agricultural Engineering, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India. hlkushwaha@gmail.com.
Adarsh KumarDivision of Agricultural Engineering, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India.
Roaf Ahmad ParrayDivision of Agricultural Engineering, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India.
Sidhartha Sekhar SwainDivision of Agricultural Engineering, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India.
Manojit ChowdhuryDivision of Agricultural Engineering, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India.
Ramineni Harsha NagDivision of Agricultural Engineering, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India.
K R AshaDepartment of Farm Machinery and Power Engineering, University of Agricultural Sciences, Raichur, 584104, India.
Sunil Kumar RathodDivision of Agricultural Engineering, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India.
Pradeep KumarDivision of Agricultural Engineering, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India.
Rohit AnandDivision of Agricultural Engineering, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India.
Nadhir Al-AnsariDepartment of Civil, Environmental, and Natural Resources Engineering, Lulea University of Technology, 97187, Luleå, Sweden. nadhir.alansari@ltu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6790-2653
Ahmed Z DewidarPrince Sultan Bin Abdulaziz International Prize for Water Chair, Prince Sultan Institute for Environmental, Water and Desert Research, King Saud University, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Mohamed A MattarPrince Sultan Bin Abdulaziz International Prize for Water Chair, Prince Sultan Institute for Environmental, Water and Desert Research, King Saud University, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia. mmattar@ksu.edu.sa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conservation Agriculture (CA) is an innovative approach that promotes sustainable farming while enhancing soil health. However, residue management challenges often hinder its adoption, causing farmers to burn crop leftovers in fields. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of various furrow openers under simulated soil bin conditions. Three types of furrow openers were examined: single disk (SD), Inverted T-type furrow opener with a plain rolling coulter (ITRC), and double disc (DD) furrow opener. Tests were conducted at different forward speeds (1.5, 2, and 2.5 km h

Indexed as

Conservation agricultureDraft requirementsResidue managementStraw cutting efficiencySustainable agricultureWorking speed

Identifiers

PMID39251718
PMCPMC11384726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.