Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39251714›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Chemistry2024

Molecular complexity as a driving force for the advancement of organic synthesis.

Brandon A Wright, Richmond Sarpong

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Lanthanide Nanotheranostics in Radiotherapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Catalytic Enantioselective Perezone-Type [5 + 2] Cycloaddition.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. A View on Molecular Complexity from the GDB Chemical Space.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Brandon A WrightDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4149-5292
Richmond SarpongDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, USA. rsarpong@berkeley.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0028-6323

Funding

Strategies and Methods for Complex Molecule Synthesis: Acquisition of a 400 MHz Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectrometer ConsoleR35GM130345 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI Richmond Sarpong · 2019 to 2026
$5.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM130345
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The generation of molecular complexity is a primary goal in the field of synthetic chemistry. In the context of retrosynthetic analysis, the concept of molecular complexity is central to identifying productive disconnections and the development of efficient total syntheses. However, this field-defining concept is frequently invoked on an intuitive basis without precise definition or appreciation of its subtleties. Methods for quantifying molecular complexity could prove useful for characterizing the state of synthesis in a more rigorous, reliable and reproducible fashion. As a first step to evaluating the importance of these methods to the state of the field, here we present our perspective on the development of molecular complexity quantification and its implications for chemical synthesis. The extension and application of these methods beyond computer-aided synthesis planning and medicinal chemistry to the traditional practice of 'complex molecule' synthesis could have the potential to unearth new opportunities and more efficient approaches for synthesis.

Identifiers

PMID39251714
PMCPMC11608557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.