Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39251628›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Detection and quantification of groundnut oil adulteration with machine learning using a comparative approach with NIRS and UV-VIS.

John-Lewis Zinia Zaukuu, Manal Napari Adam, Abena Amoakoa Nkansah, Eric Tetteh Mensah

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

John-Lewis Zinia ZaukuuDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana. zaukuu.jz@knust.edu.gh.
Manal Napari AdamDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.
Abena Amoakoa NkansahDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.
Eric Tetteh MensahDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Groundnut oil is known as a good source of essential fatty acids which are significant in the physiological development of the human body. It has a distinctive fragrant making it ideal for cooking which contribute to its demand on the market. However, some groundnut oil producers have been suspected to produce groundnut oil by blending it with cheaper oils especially palm olein at different concentrations or by adding groundnut flavor to palm olein. Over the years, there have been several methods to detect adulteration in oils which are time-consuming and expensive. Near infrared (NIR) and ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) spectroscopies are cheap and rapid methods for oil adulteration. This present study aimed to apply NIR and UV-Vis in combination with chemometrics to develop models for prediction and quantification of groundnut oil adulteration. Using principal component analysis (PCA) scores, pure and prepared adulterated samples showed overlapping showing similarities between them. Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) models developed from NIR and UV-Vis gave an average cross-validation accuracy of 92.61% and 62.14% respectively for pure groundnut oil and adulterated samples with palm olein at 0, 1, 3, 5, 10, 20, 30, 40 and 50% v/v. With partial least squares regression free fatty acid, color parameters, peroxide and iodine values could be predicted with R

Indexed as

Food ContaminationMachine LearningSpectrophotometry, UltravioletSpectroscopy, Near-InfraredDiscriminant AnalysisPalm OilPeanut OilPrincipal Component AnalysisPalm OilPeanut OilAdulterationChemometricsFree fatty acidIodine valueNear infraredPeroxide valueUltraviolet–visible

Identifiers

PMID39251628
PMCPMC11383961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.