ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2024
Racial and Sex Differences in Genomic Profiling of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Expanding Horizons in Cholangiocarcinoma: Emerging Targets Beyond FGFR2 and IDH1.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma mortality in the USA, 1999-2020: a 21-year population-based analysis.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2025Article
- ASO Author Reflections: Redefining Prognostic Endpoints in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma-The Role of Recurrence-Free Survival.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Epidemiological trends of cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder cancer in Northeastern Italy: Administrative analysis over a 17-year period (2007-2023).World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- ASO Author Reflections: Racial and Sex Differences in Genomic Profiling of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.Annals of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- ASO Author Reflections: Practice Patterns and Outcomes Among Surgical Oncology Fellowship Graduates Performing Complex Cancer Surgery in the United States Across Different Career Stages.Annals of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Recent 5‑year trends in biliary tract cancer survival rates: An analytical big data survey.Medicine internationalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRacial and sex disparities in the incidence and outcomes of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) exist, yet potential genomic variations of iCCA based on race and sex that might be contributing to disparate outcomes have not been well studied.
methodsData from the American Association for Cancer Research Project GENIE registry (version 15.0) were analyzed to assess genetic variations in iCCA. Adult patients (age >18 years) with histologically confirmed iCCA who underwent next-generation sequencing were included in the analytic cohort. Racial and sex variations in genomic profiling of iCCA were examined.
resultsThe study enrolled 1068 patients from 19 centers (White, 71.9%; Black, 5.1%; Asian, 8.4%, other, 14.6%). The male-to-female ratio was 1:1. The majority of the patients had primary tumors (73.7%), whereas 23.0% had metastatic disease sequenced. While IDH1 mutations occurred more frequently in White versus Black patients (20.8% vs. 5.6%; p = 0.021), FGFR2 mutations tended to be more common among Black versus White populations (27.8% vs. 16.1%; p = 0.08). Males were more likely to have TP53 mutations than females (24.3% vs. 18.2%, p = 0.016), whereas females more frequently had IDH1 (23.3% vs 16.0 %), FGFR2 (21.0% vs. 11.3%), and BAP1 (23.4% vs. 14.5%) mutations than males (all p < 0.05). Marked variations in the prevalence of other common genomic alterations in iCCA were noted across different races and sexes.
conclusionDistinct genomic variations exist in iCCA across race and sex. Differences in mutational profiles of iCCA patients highlight the importance of including a diverse patient population in iCCA clinical trials as well as the importance of recognizing different genetic drivers that may be targetable to treat distinct patient cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.