Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39251508›Full record

ReviewDiscover mental health2024

The electro-convulsive therapy story of Africa, a systematic review.

Joan Abaatyo, Mark Mohan Kaggwa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Discover mental health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Joan AbaatyoDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Uganda Christian University, Kampala, Uganda. joandux@gmail.com.
Mark Mohan KaggwaDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the years, the use of Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) has gained increasing acceptance as a viable treatment for managing treatment-resistant mental health conditions, and it is known to deliver more rapid therapeutic benefits than most treatment modalities in psychiatry. However, the practice of ECT exhibits significant variability both within and between countries. This review aimed to shed light on the status of ECT in the African context and its implications for mental health care in the region. In July 2023, databases (Ovid, PubMed, Web of Science, etc.) were searched for articles about ECT in Africa, following the PRISMA guidelines. Eligible studies reporting ECT practices in Africa and those about knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions were excluded. A total of 25 articles met the study criteria. The reviewed studies revealed that unmodified ECT continues to be used in some African countries due to resource limitations, while bilateral ECT is widely practiced across the continent. The primary diagnostic indications for ECT in Africa included severe depression and affective disorders. ECT usage and regulation vary significantly throughout Africa. The studies, primarily observational, detailed numerous challenges in employing the method, particularly concerning resource utilization in healthcare facilities. The review highlights the necessity for adaptable standards and local protocols to enhance ECT practices throughout Africa. It emphasizes the importance of conducting more evidence-based research to develop region-specific guidelines that ensure the safe and effective use of ECT. Policymakers and healthcare practitioners should prioritize resource allocation, training, and standardization to improve ECT delivery and outcomes on the continent.

Indexed as

AfricaECTElectroconvulsive therapyReview

Identifiers

PMID39251508
PMCPMC11383911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.