Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39251491›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2024

Evaluation of emergency department visits and immune-related adverse effects (irAEs) in patients treated with nivolumab.

Emre Kudu, Goncagul Akdag, Mahmut Emre Yildirim

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Emre KuduDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye. dr.emre.kudu@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1422-5927
Goncagul AkdagDepartment of Medical Oncology, Kartal Dr. Lütfi Kirdar City Hospital, Health Science University, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6221-0623
Mahmut Emre YildirimDepartment of Medical Oncology, Kartal Dr. Lütfi Kirdar City Hospital, Health Science University, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5360-5949

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) represents one of the most significant advancements in cancer treatment over the past decade. Nivolumab, a widely used ICI, has been incorporated into the therapeutic regimens for various cancers. As with any drug, this drug also has side effects, including class-specific immune-related adverse effects (irAEs). Although irAEs are not rare, their diagnosis can be challenging. This study examines the emergency department (ED) visits of patients undergoing nivolumab therapy, focusing on diagnostic challenges, evaluating the management, and outcomes of irAEs in the ED setting. MATERIAL AND

methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted on adult patients who received nivolumab therapy for any cancer between April 1, 2018, and March 31, 2023, at a large, urban tertiary care center. In this study, we evaluated the ED visits of patients receiving nivolumab. In addition to previous studies, we evaluated irAEs in detail (percentage, recognizability, risk factors, reasons for late recognition, and outcome). Patient data were collected from electronic medical records and patient's medical files. The anamnesis, laboratory, and imaging results, ED management, and consultation notes were examined separately for each ED visit. Logistic regression models were employed to identify significant univariable predictors of ED visits and irAEs.

resultsA total of 199 patients were included in the study, all of whom had metastatic cancer. Of these, 154 patients (77.4%) received nivolumab therapy for non-small cell lung cancer. Most patients (71.9%, n = 143) had at least one additional comorbidity. One hundred and eleven patients (55.8%) presented to the ED. Hypertension (OR: 2.425, 95% CI: 1.226-4.795, p = 0.011) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR: 2.489, 95% CI: 1.133-5.468, p = 0.023) were identified as risk factors for ED visits. A total of 21 irAEs were diagnosed (14 in ED, 6 in the oncology clinic, and 1 in the inpatient ward). Univariate analysis found no significant association between irAE diagnosis and any specific factors.

conclusionA significant proportion of the patients treated with nivolumab for advanced cancer present to ED for ICI-related adverse events, although most cases were not attributable to irAEs. Due to the vague symptomatology of irAEs, their recognition and diagnosis in the ED can be challenging. Close collaboration between ED physicians and oncologists is paramount to the management of patients with cancer in the ED.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsNeoplasmsNivolumabAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalCohort StudiesDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsEmergency Room VisitsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsNivolumabCancerEmergency department visitImmune checkpoint inhibitorsImmune related adverse eventsImmunotherapyNivolumab

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.