ReviewHerz2024
[Legal aspects in digital cardiology].
Review in Herz, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Artificial intelligence in internal medicine exemplified by cardiology].Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Digital assistants have become an indispensable tool in modern cardiology. The associated technological progress offers a significant potential to increase the efficiency of medical processes, enable more precise diagnoses in a shorter time, and thus improve patient care. However, the integration of digital assistants into clinical cardiology also raises new challenges and questions, particularly regarding the handling of legal issues. This review article aims to raise awareness of individual legal issues resulting from the use of digital technologies in cardiology. The focus is on how to deal with various legal challenges that cardiologists face, including issues related to treatment freedom, professional confidentiality and data protection. The integration of digital assistants in cardiology leads to a noticeable improvement in efficiency and quality of patient care, but at the same time, it involves a variety of legal challenges that need to be carefully addressed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39251441What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.