Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39251425›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2024

Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer with high tumor burden at biopsy: lessons learned from a contemporary radical prostatectomy cohort.

Jauffray Oliva, Vassili Anastay, Michael Baboudjian, Mathieu Roumiguié, Alexandre Peltier, Charles Dariane, Gaelle Fiard, Thierry Roumeguère, Romain Diamand, Mohamed Bakhri and 4 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Jauffray Oliva *Department of Urology, North Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, APHM, Marseille, France.
Vassili Anastay *Department of Urology, North Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, APHM, Marseille, France.
Michael BaboudjianDepartment of Urology, North Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, APHM, Marseille, France.
Mathieu RoumiguiéDepartment of Urology, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France.
Alexandre PeltierDepartment of Urology, Jules Bordet Institute and Erasme hopsital, hôpital universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Charles DarianeDepartment of Urology, Hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, APHP, Paris - Paris University - U1151 Inserm-INEM, Necker, Paris, France.
Gaelle FiardDepartment of Urology, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, TIMC, Grenoble, France.
Thierry RoumeguèreDepartment of Urology, Jules Bordet Institute and Erasme hopsital, hôpital universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Romain DiamandDepartment of Urology, Jules Bordet Institute and Erasme hopsital, hôpital universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Mohamed BakhriDepartment of Urology, North Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, APHM, Marseille, France.
Jean-Baptiste BeauvalDepartment of Urology, La Croix du Sud Hôpital, Quint Fonsegrives, France.
Thibaut Long-DepaquitDepartment of Urology, North Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, APHM, Marseille, France.
Guillaume PloussardDepartment of Urology, La Croix du Sud Hôpital, Quint Fonsegrives, France.
Alessandro UleriDepartment of Urology, North Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, APHM, Marseille, France. alessandrouleri@outlook.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2392-2775

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTo investigate whether initial tumor burden at biopsy could predict adverse features after radical prostatectomy (RP) in International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) 1 prostate cancer (PCa) patients.

methodsThis retrospective study was conducted in six referral centers. The cohort included patients with ISUP 1 PCa at systematic and MRI-targeted biopsy. We defined a high tumor burden at biopsy if ≥ 20% of cores were positive. The endpoint of the study was adverse features at RP, defined as ≥ pT3a stage and/or N1 and/or ISUP ≥ 3. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess associations between different thresholds on biopsy (percentage of positive cores [PPC] ≥ 25%, ≥ 33%, ≥ 50%, bilateral positivity and positive cores > 3) and adverse features. As the number of targeted biopsies sampled may influence the number of positive cores, we used a virtual biopsy model in which all targeted biopsy results were interpreted as a single targeted biopsy.

resultsA total of 312 contemporary patients were included. At final pathology, 99 patients (32%) had adverse features. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, there was no statistical association between PPC > 20% and adverse features (OR = 1.22; 95%CI:0.69-2.22, p = 0.5). In sensitivity analysis, tumor burden at biopsy was not associated with the risk of adverse features, regardless of the definition used (all p > 0.05). When we considered a unique virtual targeted biopsy, tumor burden remained not associated with adverse features (all p > 0.05).

conclusionsISUP 1 PCa tumor burden at biopsy did not predict adverse features in this study, suggesting that it should not be used alone as an exclusion criterion when assessing eligibility for active surveillance.

Indexed as

ProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsTumor BurdenWatchful WaitingAgedHumansImage-Guided BiopsyMaleMiddle AgedProstateRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentActive surveillanceLow gradeOncological outcomesProstate cancer

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.