Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39251424›Full record

ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2025

New histological risk grading system for prediction of lymph node metastasis in patients with penile cancer.

Luiza Dorofte, Sabina Davidsson, Jessica Carlsson, Gabriella Lillsunde Larsson, Mats G Karlsson

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Luiza DorofteDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden. luiza.dorofte@regionorebrolan.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1530-5045
Sabina DavidssonDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2850-6009
Jessica CarlssonDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8457-7592
Gabriella Lillsunde LarssonDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9992-266X
Mats G KarlssonDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6881-237X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inguinal lymph node surgery is a standard treatment for penile cancer patients with intermediate or high risk for lymph node metastasis (LNM) according to European Association of Urology (EAU) risk grading. We are proposing a more objective histological prognostic grading system for inguinal LNM in these patients. We assessed worst pattern of invasion, lymphocytic host response, lymphovascular invasion, and perineural invasion in a population-based cohort of 306 penile cancer patients. Patients were classified into low, intermediate, and high risk for inguinal LNM. There was a significant association both between risk groups and pT stage (p < 0.001) and between risk groups and LNM. Univariate logistic regression showed 25.43 times higher odds of LNM for patients in the intermediate risk group compared with the low risk group (odds ratio (OR) 25.43; 95% confidence interval (CI): 5.94-108.97) and a 177.13 times higher odds in the high risk group compared to the low risk group (OR 177.13; 95% CI: 40.09-782.51). When comparing our histological risk grading with the EAU grading, we found a higher sensitivity, of 51.28% (95% CI: 45.68-56.88) versus 37.09% (95% CI: 31.68-42.50), as well as a higher area under the curve (0.86; 95% CI: 0.81-0.89; versus 0.65; 95% CI: 0.58-0.71) with our grading system. While our grading classified 111 patients as low risk, only 31 were considered low risk for LNM according to the EAU risk classification. The new histological risk grading system shows a higher sensitivity and includes a higher number of patients in the low risk group in whom lymph node surgery could be avoided, reducing morbidity and costs.

Indexed as

Lymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesNeoplasm GradingPenile NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsHistological risk gradingLymph node metastasisPenile cancerRisk groups

Identifiers

PMID39251424
PMCPMC12018598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.