Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39251363›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomaterials applications2025

Biomimetic synthetic test system based on hydroxyapatite cement for adhesive strength evaluation of experimental mineral-organic bone adhesive materials.

Paul Frederik Otto, Sebastian Hienz, Silvia Mittmann, Niklas Dümmler, Tobias Renner, Csaba Gergely, Juliane Carolin Kade, Uwe Gbureck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomaterials applications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Paul Frederik OttoDepartment for Functional Materials in Medicine and Dentistry, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID 0009-0000-4807-9641
Sebastian HienzDepartment for Functional Materials in Medicine and Dentistry, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Silvia MittmannDepartment for Functional Materials in Medicine and Dentistry, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Niklas DümmlerDepartment for Functional Materials in Medicine and Dentistry, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Tobias RennerDepartment for Functional Materials in Medicine and Dentistry, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Csaba GergelyDepartment for Functional Materials in Medicine and Dentistry, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID 0009-0006-8630-7055
Juliane Carolin KadeDepartment for Functional Materials in Medicine and Dentistry, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Uwe GbureckDepartment for Functional Materials in Medicine and Dentistry, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2584-4176

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of bone adhesive materials is a research field of high relevance for the advancement of clinical procedures. Despite this, there are currently no material candidates meeting the full range of requirements placed on such a material, such as biocompatibility, sufficient mechanical properties and bond strength under biological conditions, practical applicability in a clinical setting, and no adverse effect on the healing process itself. A serious obstacle to the advancement of the field is a lack in standardized methodology leading to comparable results between experiments and different research groups. Natural bone samples are the current gold-standard material used to perform adhesive strength experiments, however they come with a number of drawbacks, including high sample variability due to unavoidable natural causes and the impossibility to reliably recreate test conditions to repeat experiments. This paper introduces a valuable auxiliary test method capable of producing large numbers of synthetic test specimens which are chemically similar to bone and can be produced in different laboratories so to repeat experiments under constant conditions across laboratories. The substrate is based on a hydroxyapatite forming cement with addition of gelatine as organic component. Crosslinking of the organic component is performed to improve mechanical properties. In order to demonstrate the performance of the developed method, various experimental and commercial bone/tissue adhesive materials were tested and compared with results obtained by established methods to highlight the potential of the test system.

Indexed as

Biomimetic MaterialsBone CementsMaterials TestingAdhesivenessBiocompatible MaterialsDurapatiteGelatinHumansHydroxyapatitesTensile StrengthTissue AdhesivesBiocompatible MaterialsBone CementsDurapatiteGelatinhydroxyapatite cementHydroxyapatitesTissue AdhesivesBone adhesive materialcalcium phosphate cementmagnesium phosphate cementNCO-sP(EO-stat-PO)phytic acid

Identifiers

PMID39251363
PMCPMC11707973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.