Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39250897›Full record

ArticleNephron2025

Preferences for Advance Care Planning in Patients with End-Stage Kidney Disease: A Cross-Sectional Survey among Nephrology Healthcare Providers in a Tertiary Care Center in India.

Bharathi Naik, Arun Ghoshal, Anuja Damani, Pankaj Singhai, Ravindra Prabhu Attur, Naveen Salins, Ajith M Nayak, Shankar Prasad Nagaraju

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nephron, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bharathi NaikDepartment of Renal Replacement Therapy and Dialysis Technology, Manipal College of Health Professions, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
Arun GhoshalDepartment of Palliative Medicine and Supportive Care, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
Anuja DamaniDepartment of Palliative Medicine and Supportive Care, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
Pankaj SinghaiDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Sri Aurobindo Medical College and PG Institute, Sri Aurobindo University, Indore, India.
Ravindra Prabhu AtturDepartment of Nephrology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
Naveen SalinsDepartment of Palliative Medicine and Supportive Care, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
Ajith M NayakDepartment of Renal Replacement Therapy and Dialysis Technology, Manipal College of Health Professions, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
Shankar Prasad NagarajuDepartment of Nephrology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAdvance care planning (ACP) is essential in managing patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), yet its integration into clinical practice remains limited, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. This study explores the preferences, attitudes and perceived barriers of nephrology healthcare providers toward ACP for patients with ESKD in a tertiary care center in India.

methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted among nephrology healthcare providers at a tertiary care center in India. The survey, developed from literature reviews and pretested, covered demographics, ACP knowledge and attitudes, current practices, and perceived barriers and facilitators. Data collection occurred from September 2022 to March 2023. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively, and qualitative data through thematic analysis.

resultsA total of 50 healthcare providers participated. While 36% acknowledged the importance of ACP, only 8% routinely engaged in ACP discussions. Major barriers included inadequate training (22%), lack of awareness about the importance of discussing ACP among stakeholders (20%), cultural barriers (18%), lack of time (14%), and the absence of institutional protocols for discussion on ACP (14%). Additional barriers included instances where families withhold health information from patients due to fear of losing hope (16%) and patient/family discomfort in discussing ACP (12%). Providers expressed a need for structured ACP protocols and educational programs.

conclusionDespite recognizing its importance, ACP is underutilized in the care of patients with ESKD in India. Addressing the identified barriers through targeted interventions may enhance ACP practices and improve patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningAttitude of Health PersonnelHealth PersonnelKidney Failure, ChronicNephrologyAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesTertiary Care CentersACP questionnaireAdvance care planningEnd-stage kidney disease

Identifiers

PMID39250897
PMCPMC11731831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.