ArticleJournal of neurosurgery. Case lessons2024
Persistent trigeminal artery aneurysm rupture inducing a carotid-cavernous fistula: its presentation and management. Illustrative case.
Article in Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA carotid-cavernous fistula (CCF) is a well-recognized entity resulting from an abnormal connection between the internal carotid artery (ICA) or external carotid artery and the cavernous sinus. Typical CCF symptomology includes proptosis, chemosis, orbital bruit, headache, facial pain, and cranial nerve (CN) palsies. While CCFs most often occur posttraumatically, they can also occur spontaneously, secondary to cavernous ICA aneurysm rupture. Very rarely, they can occur secondary to the rupture of an anomalous persistent trigeminal artery (PTA) aneurysm. OBSERVATIONS: Herein, the authors describe the case of a 54-year-old woman who presented with a CN VI palsy and headache due to a CCF secondary to a PTA aneurysm rupture. The CCF was ultimately treated via coil embolization of the aneurysm and the parent PTA vessel. LESSONS: Though such occurrences are rare, clinicians should be vigilant in assessing for the presence of a PTA in patients with a CCF, as a PTA-associated CCF requires unique treatment considerations. In some cases where the PTA plays a crucial role in the posterior circulation supply, preservation of the parent vessel PTA is crucial. However, in cases in which an adequate posterior circulation collateral supply exists, embolization of the aneurysm and the parent vessel PTA is a reasonable treatment option for fistula closure. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE24287.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.