Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39250808›Full record

ReviewAnnals of internal medicine2024

Complementary and Alternative Therapies for Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause : An Evidence Map.

Kristen E Ullman, Susan Diem, Mary L Forte, Kristine Ensrud, Catherine Sowerby, Nicholas Zerzan, Maylen Anthony, Adrienne Landsteiner, Nancy Greer, Mary Butler and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of internal medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Kristen E UllmanCenter for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota (K.E.U., C.S., N.Z., M.A., A.L., N.G.).ORCID 0000-0002-4726-3997
Susan DiemCenter for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, VA Health Care System, and Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (S.D., E.R.D.).
Mary L ForteDivision of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (M.L.F., M.B.).ORCID 0000-0003-4566-2529
Kristine EnsrudCenter for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, VA Health Care System, and Department of Medicine and Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (K.E.).
Catherine SowerbyCenter for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota (K.E.U., C.S., N.Z., M.A., A.L., N.G.).
Nicholas ZerzanCenter for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota (K.E.U., C.S., N.Z., M.A., A.L., N.G.).
Maylen AnthonyCenter for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota (K.E.U., C.S., N.Z., M.A., A.L., N.G.).
Adrienne LandsteinerCenter for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota (K.E.U., C.S., N.Z., M.A., A.L., N.G.).
Nancy GreerCenter for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota (K.E.U., C.S., N.Z., M.A., A.L., N.G.).
Mary ButlerDivision of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (M.L.F., M.B.).
Timothy J WiltCenter for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, VA Health Care System, and Department of Medicine and Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (T.J.W.).
Elisheva R DananCenter for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, VA Health Care System, and Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (S.D., E.R.D.).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWomen seeking nonhormonal interventions for vulvovaginal, urinary, and sexual symptoms associated with genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) may seek out complementary and alternative medicine or therapies (CAMs). PURPOSE: To summarize published evidence of CAMs for GSM. DATA SOURCES: Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL from inception through 11 December 2023. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) 8 weeks or more in duration that evaluated the effectiveness or harms of CAMs for postmenopausal women with GSM and reported 1 or more outcomes of interest, with sample sizes of 20 or more participants randomly assigned per group. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were abstracted by 1 reviewer and verified by a second. DATA SYNTHESIS: An evidence map approach was used to organize and describe trials. Studies were organized by type of intervention, with narrative summaries for population, study characteristics, interventions, and outcomes. Fifty-seven trials were identified that investigated 39 unique interventions. Studies were typically small ( LIMITATIONS: Only English-language studies were used. Effect estimates, risk of bias, and certainty of evidence were not assessed.

conclusionThere is a large and heterogeneous literature of CAM interventions for GSM. Trials were small, and few were done in North America. Standardized population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes reporting in future RCTs are needed. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. (PROSPERO: CRD42023400684).

Indexed as

Complementary TherapiesFemale Urogenital DiseasesMenopauseFemaleHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSexual Dysfunction, PhysiologicalSyndrome

Identifiers

PMID39250808
PMCPMC12270004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.