ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2024
Sub-sampling graph neural networks for genomic prediction of quantitative phenotypes.
Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating deep learning and pangenomics to recover missing heritability from wild structural variations.BMC genomics · 2026Review
- LSTM-attention-guided graph neural networks for integrated genotype-Environment modeling in maize yield prediction.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Impact of scale parameter for marker variance prior in some Bayesian whole-genome regression methods.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2026Article
- Critical evaluation of the theory and practice of feed-forward neural networks for genomic prediction.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- The next frontier for genomic prediction is computational.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Beyond QTL and GWAS: how deep learning, graph models, and multi-omics are reshaping plant genomic prediction analysis.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Review
- Enhancing wheat genomic prediction by a hybrid kernel approach.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In genomics, use of deep learning (DL) is rapidly growing and DL has successfully demonstrated its ability to uncover complex relationships in large biological and biomedical data sets. With the development of high-throughput sequencing techniques, genomic markers can now be allocated to large sections of a genome. By analyzing allele sharing between individuals, one may calculate realized genomic relationships from single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) data rather than relying on known pedigree relationships under polygenic model. The traditional approaches in genome-wide prediction (GWP) of quantitative phenotypes utilize genomic relationships in fixed global covariance modeling, possibly with some nonlinear kernel mapping (for example Gaussian processes). On the other hand, the DL approaches proposed so far for GWP fail to take into account the non-Euclidean graph structure of relationships between individuals over several generations. In this paper, we propose one global convolutional neural network (GCN) and one local sub-sampling architecture (GCN-RS) that are specifically designed to perform regression analysis based on genomic relationship information. A GCN is tailored to non-Euclidean spaces and consists of several layers of graph convolutions. The GCN-RS architecture is designed to further improve the GCN's performance by sub-sampling the graph to reduce the dimensionality of the input data. Through these graph convolutional layers, the GCN maps input genomic markers to their quantitative phenotype values. The graphs are constructed using an iterative nearest neighbor approach. Comparisons show that the GCN-RS outperforms the popular Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Predictor method on one simulated and three real datasets from wheat, mice and pig with a predictive improvement of 4.4% to 49.4% in terms of test mean squared error. This indicates that GCN-RS is a promising tool for genomic predictions in plants and animals. Furthermore, GCN-RS is computationally efficient, making it a viable option for large-scale applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.