Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39250757›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2024

Sub-sampling graph neural networks for genomic prediction of quantitative phenotypes.

Ragini Kihlman, Ilkka Launonen, Mikko J Sillanpää, Patrik Waldmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Impact of scale parameter for marker variance prior in some Bayesian whole-genome regression methods.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ragini KihlmanResearch Unit of Mathematical Sciences, University of Oulu, FI-90014 University of Oulu, Finland.
Ilkka LaunonenResearch Unit of Mathematical Sciences, University of Oulu, FI-90014 University of Oulu, Finland.
Mikko J SillanpääResearch Unit of Mathematical Sciences, University of Oulu, FI-90014 University of Oulu, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-2808-2768
Patrik WaldmannResearch Unit of Mathematical Sciences, University of Oulu, FI-90014 University of Oulu, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-2390-6609

Funding

Academy of Finland 326291
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In genomics, use of deep learning (DL) is rapidly growing and DL has successfully demonstrated its ability to uncover complex relationships in large biological and biomedical data sets. With the development of high-throughput sequencing techniques, genomic markers can now be allocated to large sections of a genome. By analyzing allele sharing between individuals, one may calculate realized genomic relationships from single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) data rather than relying on known pedigree relationships under polygenic model. The traditional approaches in genome-wide prediction (GWP) of quantitative phenotypes utilize genomic relationships in fixed global covariance modeling, possibly with some nonlinear kernel mapping (for example Gaussian processes). On the other hand, the DL approaches proposed so far for GWP fail to take into account the non-Euclidean graph structure of relationships between individuals over several generations. In this paper, we propose one global convolutional neural network (GCN) and one local sub-sampling architecture (GCN-RS) that are specifically designed to perform regression analysis based on genomic relationship information. A GCN is tailored to non-Euclidean spaces and consists of several layers of graph convolutions. The GCN-RS architecture is designed to further improve the GCN's performance by sub-sampling the graph to reduce the dimensionality of the input data. Through these graph convolutional layers, the GCN maps input genomic markers to their quantitative phenotype values. The graphs are constructed using an iterative nearest neighbor approach. Comparisons show that the GCN-RS outperforms the popular Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Predictor method on one simulated and three real datasets from wheat, mice and pig with a predictive improvement of 4.4% to 49.4% in terms of test mean squared error. This indicates that GCN-RS is a promising tool for genomic predictions in plants and animals. Furthermore, GCN-RS is computationally efficient, making it a viable option for large-scale applications.

Indexed as

GenomicsNeural Networks, ComputerPhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideAlgorithmsAnimalsGenome-Wide Association StudyModels, GeneticQuantitative Trait LociTriticumdeep learninggraph convolutionpredictive Breedingquantitative genetics

Identifiers

PMID39250757
PMCPMC11540326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.