ArticlePloS one2024
Data-centric AI approach for automated wildflower monitoring.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present the Eindhoven Wildflower Dataset (EWD) as well as a PyTorch object detection model that is able to classify and count wildflowers. EWD, collected over two entire flowering seasons and expert annotated, contains 2,002 top-view images of flowering plants captured 'in the wild' in five different landscape types (roadsides, urban green spaces, cropland, weed-rich grassland, marshland). It holds a total of 65,571 annotations for 160 species belonging to 31 different families of flowering plants and serves as a reference dataset for automating wildflower monitoring and object detection in general. To ensure consistent annotations, we define species-specific floral count units and provide extensive annotation guidelines. With a 0.82 mAP (@IoU > 0.50) score the presented baseline model, trained on a balanced subset of EWD, is to the best of our knowledge superior in its class. Our approach empowers automated quantification of wildflower richness and abundance, which helps understanding and assessing natural capital, and encourages the development of standards for AI-based wildflower monitoring. The annotated EWD dataset and the code to train and run the baseline model are publicly available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.