Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39250223›Full record

ArticleClinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN2024

Experiences of Social Isolation and Loneliness in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Secondary Qualitative Analysis.

Amanda Sluiter, Rosanna Cazzolli, Allison Jaure, Nicole Scholes-Robertson, Jonathan C Craig, David W Johnson, Andrea Matus Gonzalez, Benedicte Sautenet, Ben J Smith, Karine Manera and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The social needs of patients with kidney failure.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Amanda SluiterSydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0009-0001-3003-4354
Rosanna CazzolliSydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0009-0004-5651-8789
Allison JaureSydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8973-9538
Nicole Scholes-RobertsonSydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8260-0453
Jonathan C CraigCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2548-4035
David W JohnsonDepartment of Kidney and Transplant Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5491-3460
Andrea Matus GonzalezSydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Benedicte SautenetService de Néphrologie, Hôpital Bretonneau, CHRU Tours, Université de Tours et Nantes, SPHERE-INSERM, Tours, France.
Ben J SmithSydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9014-7254
Karine ManeraSydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0552-6074
SONG initiative

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council APP1194485National Health and Medical Research Council APP2008774
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID39250223
PMCPMC11556901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.