Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39250193›Full record

ReviewJMIR serious games2024

Effectiveness of Technological Interventions for Older Adults With Parkinson Disease: Systematic Review.

Roberta Bevilacqua, Marco Benadduci, Federico Barbarossa, Giulio Amabili, Valentina Di Donna, Clotilda Martella, Giuseppe Pelliccioni, Giovanni Renato Riccardi, Elvira Maranesi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JMIR serious games, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Roberta BevilacquaIRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3851-3552
Marco BenadduciIRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0292-6910
Federico BarbarossaIRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8701-9879
Giulio AmabiliIRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2005-4319
Valentina Di DonnaIRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8466-1994
Clotilda MartellaIRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-5921-4780
Giuseppe PelliccioniIRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0377-9713
Giovanni Renato RiccardiIRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1630-1364
Elvira MaranesiIRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2414-3773

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAmong the older population, Parkinson disease (PD) stands out as a leading contributor to disability. Clinically, the foremost objectives in managing PD involve proactively delaying and preventing disability. Understanding the pivotal role of gait and balance in daily functionality holds substantial clinical significance, signaling imminent disability and prompting a reevaluation of management approaches. A key priority lies in identifying novel and effective interventions for symptoms that substantially contribute to disability.

objectiveThis paper presents a systematic review that critically examines the existing body of literature on the use of technology in the rehabilitation of older patients with PD. By synthesizing current evidence, we aim to provide insights into the state of the field, identify gaps in knowledge, and offer recommendations for future research and clinical practice.

methodsA systematic review of the literature was conducted in September 2023 analyzing manuscripts and papers of the last 5 years from the PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and CINAHL databases following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. A total of 14 papers were included. The inclusion criteria are as follows: (1) randomized controlled trial, (2) PD in people aged 65 years and older, and (3) use of technology in the rehabilitation training in the older population.

resultsA large portion of effective interventions relies on the incorporation of technology, particularly through virtual reality exergames. This technology appears to have effects not only on the cognitive aspect but also on the physical domain. The analysis of the results clearly indicates that, in terms of gait and balance performance, the technological intervention outperforms the traditional approach, irrespective of the specific technology employed.

conclusionsThis systematic review seeks to shed light on the evolving landscape of technology-assisted rehabilitation for older individuals with PD. As we delve into the available evidence, we will assess the extent to which technology can serve as a valuable adjunct to conventional therapy, offering new avenues for optimized care and improved outcomes in this growing patient demographic. As we sift through the existing evidence, our goal is to evaluate the potential of technology as a valuable supplement to traditional therapy, presenting fresh opportunities for enhanced care and better outcomes in this expanding patient demographic.

Indexed as

efficacyolder adultsParkinson diseaserandomized controlled trailtechnological intervention

Identifiers

PMID39250193
PMCPMC11430395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.