Observational studyInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2024
Using Multi-Layer Perceptron Driven Diagnosis to Compare Biomarkers for Primary Open Angle Glaucoma.
Observational study in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning models for predicting cerebrospinal fluid bacterial culture outcomes in post-neurosurgical meningitis-development and temporal three-year validation.Archives of microbiology · 2026Article
- A deep learning-based radiomic nomogram derived from visceral fat for early prediction of gastrointestinal stromal tumor risk grade.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Primary open-angle glaucoma: a perspective from plasma metabolomics.Expert review of molecular diagnostics · 2025Review
- Construction and evaluation of a height prediction model for children with growth disorders treated with recombinant human growth hormone.BMC endocrine disorders · 2025Article
- Impact of Vascular Network Structure Heterogeneity on Retinal Tissue Oxygenation.La matematica · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To use neural network machine learning (ML) models to identify the most relevant ocular biomarkers for the diagnosis of primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). Methods: Neural network models, also known as multi-layer perceptrons (MLPs), were trained on a prospectively collected observational dataset comprised of 93 glaucoma patients confirmed by a glaucoma specialist and 113 control subjects. The base model used only intraocular pressure, blood pressure, heart rate, and visual field (VF) parameters to diagnose glaucoma. The following models were given the base parameters in addition to one of the following biomarkers: structural features (optic nerve parameters, retinal nerve fiber layer [RNFL], ganglion cell complex [GCC] and macular thickness), choroidal thickness, and RNFL and GCC thickness only, by optical coherence tomography (OCT); and vascular features by OCT angiography (OCTA). Results: MLPs of three different structures were evaluated with tenfold cross validation. The testing area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the models were compared with independent samples t-tests. The vascular and structural models both had significantly higher accuracies than the base model, with the hemodynamic AUC (0.819) insignificantly outperforming the structural set AUC (0.816). The GCC + RNFL model and the model containing all structural and vascular features were also significantly more accurate than the base model. Conclusions: Neural network models indicate that OCTA optic nerve head vascular biomarkers are equally useful for ML diagnosis of POAG when compared to OCT structural biomarker features alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.