Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39250119›Full record

Observational studyInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2024

Using Multi-Layer Perceptron Driven Diagnosis to Compare Biomarkers for Primary Open Angle Glaucoma.

Nicholas Riina, Alon Harris, Brent A Siesky, Lukas Ritzer, Louis R Pasquale, James C Tsai, James Keller, Barbara Wirostko, Julia Arciero, Brendan Fry and 5 more

Abstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Primary open-angle glaucoma: a perspective from plasma metabolomics.Expert review of molecular diagnostics · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Nicholas RiinaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States.
Alon HarrisDepartment of Ophthalmology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States.
Brent A SieskyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States.
Lukas RitzerDepartment of Ophthalmology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States.
Louis R PasqualeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States.
James C TsaiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States.
James KellerDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, United States.
Barbara WirostkoUniversity of Utah Health John A Moran Eye Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States.
Julia ArcieroDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, IUPUI School of Science, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States.
Brendan FryDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Metropolitan State University of Denver, Denver, Colorado, United States.
George EckertDepartment of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States.
Alice Verticchio VercellinDepartment of Ophthalmology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States.
Gal AntmanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States.
Paul A SidotiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States.
Giovanna GuidoboniMaine College of Engineering and Computing, The University of Maine, Orono, Maine, United States.

Funding

Understanding the clinical impact of cumulative genetic risk to glaucomaR01EY032559 · NEI · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI Louis Robert Pasquale, Janey L Wiggs · 2021 to 2026
$4.3M
Integration of clinical measures and theoretical modeling to quantify sectorial specific changes in ocular structure, function, and hemodynamicsR01EY030851 · NEI · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI ARCIERO, JULIA, HARRIS, ALON · 2020 to 2023
$1.3M
SCH: SEEthroughGLAUCOMA: Smart Eye Emulator (SEE) to study glaucoma risk factorsR01EY034718 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MAINE ORONO · PI GUIDOBONI, GIOVANNA, HARRIS, ALON · 2022 to 2025
$975k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY030851NEI NIH HHS R01 EY032559NEI NIH HHS R01 EY034718
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To use neural network machine learning (ML) models to identify the most relevant ocular biomarkers for the diagnosis of primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). Methods: Neural network models, also known as multi-layer perceptrons (MLPs), were trained on a prospectively collected observational dataset comprised of 93 glaucoma patients confirmed by a glaucoma specialist and 113 control subjects. The base model used only intraocular pressure, blood pressure, heart rate, and visual field (VF) parameters to diagnose glaucoma. The following models were given the base parameters in addition to one of the following biomarkers: structural features (optic nerve parameters, retinal nerve fiber layer [RNFL], ganglion cell complex [GCC] and macular thickness), choroidal thickness, and RNFL and GCC thickness only, by optical coherence tomography (OCT); and vascular features by OCT angiography (OCTA). Results: MLPs of three different structures were evaluated with tenfold cross validation. The testing area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the models were compared with independent samples t-tests. The vascular and structural models both had significantly higher accuracies than the base model, with the hemodynamic AUC (0.819) insignificantly outperforming the structural set AUC (0.816). The GCC + RNFL model and the model containing all structural and vascular features were also significantly more accurate than the base model. Conclusions: Neural network models indicate that OCTA optic nerve head vascular biomarkers are equally useful for ML diagnosis of POAG when compared to OCT structural biomarker features alone.

Indexed as

BiomarkersGlaucoma, Open-AngleIntraocular PressureNerve FibersNeural Networks, ComputerRetinal Ganglion CellsROC CurveTomography, Optical CoherenceVisual FieldsAgedArea Under CurveFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOptic DiskBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID39250119
PMCPMC11385878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.