ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2024
Quantitative Perfusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Uveal Melanoma.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantitative assessment of perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for the differential diagnosis of various intraocular lesions.Neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Reproducibility of Perfusion-Weighted and Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Ocular Tumours.Ocular oncology and pathology · 2026Article
- Comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced-magnetic resonance imaging parameters and serum markers in preoperative rectal cancer evaluation: Combined diagnostic value.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI; magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) has been shown to provide valuable biological tumor information in uveal melanoma (UM). Clinically used semiquantitative methods do not account for tumor pigmentation and eye movement. We hypothesize that a quantitative PWI method that incorporates these, provides a more accurate description of tumor perfusion than the current clinical method. The aim of this study was to test this in patients with UM before and after radiotherapy. Methods: Perfusion-weighted 3T MRIs were retrospectively analyzed in 47 patients with UM before and after radiotherapy. Tofts pharmacokinetic modeling was performed to determine vascular permeability (Ktrans), extracellular extravascular space (ve), and reflux rate (kep). These were compared with semiquantitative clinical parameters including peak intensity and outflow percentage. Results: The effect of tumor pigmentation on peak intensity and outflow percentage was statistically significant (P < 0.01) and relative peak intensity was significantly different between melanotic and amelanotic tumors (1.5 vs. 1.9, P < 0.01). Before radiotherapy, median tumor Ktrans was 0.63 min-1 (range = 0.06-1.42 min-1), median ve was 0.23 (range = 0.09-0.63), and median kep was 2.3 min-1 (range = 0.6-5.0 min-1). After radiotherapy, 85% showed a decrease in Ktrans and kep (P < 0.01). Changes in tumor pigmentation before and after radiotherapy were small and not significant (median increase in T1 of 33 ms, P = 0.55). Conclusions: Quantitative PWI parameters decreased significantly after radiotherapy and can therefore can serve as an early biomarker for treatment response assessment. However, due to the nonsignificant changes in tumor pigmentation before and after radiotherapy, the current semiquantitative method appears to be sufficiently sensitive for detection of changes in tumor perfusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.