ArticleGigaScience2024
Disentangling river and swamp buffalo genetic diversity: initial insights from the 1000 Buffalo Genomes Project.
Article in GigaScience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring Genomic Variability in the Mediterranean Buffalo Breed: A Step Towards Custom SNP Array.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Insights into natural neocentromere evolution from a cattle T2T X chromosome.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Advancements in Animal Breeding: From Mendelian Genetics to Machine Learning.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Genetic and Antigenic Diversity ofViruses · 2025Article
- De-novo assembled mitochondrial genome of Bhadawari buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) reveals close divergence to Egyptian buffalo.BMC veterinary research · 2025Article
- A comprehensive water buffalo pangenome reveals extensive structural variation linked to population-specific signatures of selection.GigaScience · 2025Article
- Disentangling river and swamp buffalo genetic diversity: initial insights from the 1000 Buffalo Genomes Project.GigaScience · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
More people in the world depend on water buffalo for their livelihoods than on any other domesticated animals, but its genetics is still not extensively explored. The 1000 Buffalo Genomes Project (1000BGP) provides genetic resources for global buffalo population study and tools to breed more sustainable and productive buffaloes. Here we report the most contiguous swamp buffalo genome assembly (PCC_UOA_SB_1v2) with substantial resolution of telomeric and centromeric repeats, ∼4-fold more contiguous than the existing reference river buffalo assembly and exceeding a recently published male swamp buffalo genome. This assembly was used along with the current reference to align 140 water buffalo short-read sequences and produce a public genetic resource with an average of ∼41 million single nucleotide polymorphisms per swamp and river buffalo genome. Comparison of the swamp and river buffalo sequences showed ∼1.5% genetic differences, and estimated divergence time occurred 3.1 million years ago (95% CI, 2.6-4.9). The open science model employed in the 1000BGP provides a key genomic resource and tools for a species with global economic relevance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.