SynthesisEndocrine2025
Diagnostic performance of 2-[
Synthesis in Endocrine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Role ofMedical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Long-term clinical outcomes of differentiated thyroid cancer patients with biochemical incomplete response after initial radioiodine therapy, a single-center, retrospective analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Clinico-pathological factors and [BMC medical imaging · 2024Article
- The Role of Radioiodine Therapy in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer Arising from Struma Ovarii: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Role of [Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis updated systematic review and bivariate meta-analysis aimed to investigate the diagnostic performance of 2-[
methodsThe current systematic review was carried out following a preset protocol, and the "Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis" served as a guideline for its development and reporting. A comprehensive research of the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane library databases was conducted until June 2024.
resultsBetween 2002 and 2023, 13 studies (608 patients) published on this topic were selected. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of 2-[
conclusions2-[
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.