ArticleMarine biotechnology (New York, N.Y.)2024
Embryonic Genome Activation (EGA) Occurred at 1-Cell Stage of Embryonic Development in the Mud Crab, Scylla paramamosain, Revealed by RNA-Seq.
Article in Marine biotechnology (New York, N.Y.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- In Vitro Hatching ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Single-cell nuclear RNA-sequencing reveals dynamic changes in breast muscle cells during the embryonic development of Ding'an goose.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As a prerequisite for the success of embryo development, embryonic genome activation (EGA) is an important biological event in which zygotic gene products in the embryo are activated to replace maternal-derived transcripts. Although EGA has been extensively studied in a large number of vertebrates and invertebrates, there is a lack of information regarding this event in crustacean crab. In this study, the timing of EGA was confirmed by examining a transcriptomic dataset of early embryonic development, including mature oocytes and embryos through six early developmental stages, and signaling pathways associated with EGA were identified in the mud crab, S. paramamosain. The comprehensive transcriptomic data identified a total of 53,915 transcripts from these sequencing samples. Notable transcriptomic change was evident at the 1-cell stage, indicated by a 36% transcript number shift and a reduction in transcript fragment length, compared to those present in the mature oocytes. Concurrently, a substantial increase in the expression of newly transcribed transcripts was observed, with gene counts reaching 3485 at the 1-cell stage, indicative of the onset of EGA. GO functional enrichment revealed key biological processes initiated at the 1-cell stage, such as protein complex formation, protein metabolism, and various biosynthetic processes. KEGG analysis identified several critical signaling pathways activated during EGA, including the "cell cycle," "spliceosome," "RNA degradation", and "RNA polymerase", pathways. Furthermore, transcription factor families, including zinc finger, T-box, Nrf1, and Tub were predominantly enriched at the 1-cell stage, suggesting their pivotal roles in regulating embryonic development through the targeting of specific DNA sequences during the EGA process. This groundbreaking study not only addresses a significant knowledge gap regarding the developmental biology of S. paramamosain, especially for the understanding of the mechanism underlying EGA, but also provides scientific data crucial for the research on the individual synchronization of seed breeding within S. paramamosain aquaculture. Additionally, it serves as a reference basis for the study of early embryonic development in other crustacean species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39249630What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.