ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2025
PelviNet: A Collaborative Multi-agent Convolutional Network for Enhanced Pelvic Image Registration.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PelviNet introduces a groundbreaking multi-agent convolutional network architecture tailored for enhancing pelvic image registration. This innovative framework leverages shared convolutional layers, enabling synchronized learning among agents and ensuring an exhaustive analysis of intricate 3D pelvic structures. The architecture combines max pooling, parametric ReLU activations, and agent-specific layers to optimize both individual and collective decision-making processes. A communication mechanism efficiently aggregates outputs from these shared layers, enabling agents to make well-informed decisions by harnessing combined intelligence. PelviNet's evaluation centers on both quantitative accuracy metrics and visual representations to elucidate agents' performance in pinpointing optimal landmarks. Empirical results demonstrate PelviNet's superiority over traditional methods, achieving an average image-wise error of 2.8 mm, a subject-wise error of 3.2 mm, and a mean Euclidean distance error of 3.0 mm. These quantitative results highlight the model's efficiency and precision in landmark identification, crucial for medical contexts such as radiation therapy, where exact landmark identification significantly influences treatment outcomes. By reliably identifying critical structures, PelviNet advances pelvic image analysis and offers potential enhancements for broader medical imaging applications, marking a significant step forward in computational healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.