ArticleJournal of anesthesia2024
Decrease of the peak heights of EEG bicoherence indicated insufficiency of analgesia during surgery under general anesthesia.
Article in Journal of anesthesia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundStudies show that the two peak heights of electroencephalographic bicoherence (pBIC-high, pBIC-low) decrease after incision and are restored by fentanyl administration. We investigated whether pBICs are good indicators for adequacy of analgesia during surgery.
methodsAfter local ethical committee approval, we enrolled 50 patients (27-65 years, ASA-PS I or II) who were scheduled elective surgery. Besides standard anesthesia monitors, to assess pBICs, we used a BIS monitor and freeware Bispectrum Analyzer for A2000. Fentanyl 5 µg/kg was completely administered before incision, and anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane. After skin incision, when the peak of pBIC-high or pBIC-low decreased by 10% in absolute value (named LT10-high and LT10-low groups in order) or when either peak decreased to below 20% (BL20-high and BL20-low groups), an additional 1 g/kg of fentanyl was administered to examine its effect on the peak that showed a decrease.
resultsThe mean values and standard deviation for pBIC-high 5 min before fentanyl administration, at the time of fentanyl administration, and 5 min after fentanyl administration for LT10-high group were 39.8% (10.9%), 26.9% (10.5%), and 35.7% (12.5%). And those for pBIC-low for LT10-low group were 39.5% (6.0%), 26.8% (6.4%) and 35.0% (7.0%). Those for pBIC-high for BL20-high group were 26.3% (5.6%), 16.5% (2.6%), and 25.7% (7.0%). And those for pBIC-low for BL20-low group were 26.7% (4.8%), 17.4% (1.8%) and 26.9% (5.7%), respectively. Meanwhile, at these trigger points, hemodynamic parameters didn't show significant changes.
conclusionSuperior to standard anesthesia monitoring, pBICs are better indicators of analgesia during surgery. TRIAL REGISTRY: Clinical trial Number and registry URL: UMIN ID: UMIN000042843 https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno = R000048907.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39249492What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.