ArticleMolecular biology reports2024
Association of MTR and MTRR polymorphisms with recurrent pregnancy loss: a case control study.
Article in Molecular biology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exploring the epigenetic mechanisms of recurrent pregnancy loss: from genetic predisposition to environmental influences.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn light of several epidemiological studies, the etiology of recurrent pregnancy loss is complex. One of the most frequent causes of women experiencing inexplicable recurrent pregnancy loss is maternal thrombophilia. Hence, the association between genetic polymorphisms causing thrombophilia and recurrent pregnancy loss needs to be explored.
aimIs to study the relation of polymorphisms affecting folate pathway mainly, 5-Methytetrahydrofolate-Homocysteine Methyltransferase (MTR A2756G) and 5-Methytetrahydrofolate-Homocysteine MethyltransferaseReductase (MTRR A66G) with recurrent pregnancy loss.
methodsIt is a case-control study. Four hundred participants were enrolled. Two hundred participants with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss (case group) and two hundred healthy fertile participants (control group). All participants were screened for (MTR A2756G) and (MTRR A66G). DNA was extracted using salting out method followed by genotyping via Real-time PCR.
resultsMutant homozygous genotype (GG) in MTRR A66G was statistically significantly among RPL group in comparison to controls. (GG vs. AA) had odds ratio and confidence interval of 1.22(1.12-2.23), P = 0.012. (GG) increased the liability 1.2 folds for recurrent pregnancy loss. Mutant homozygous genotype (GG) in MTR A2756G was not correlated with the risk of recurrent pregnancy loss. (GG vs.AA) = (1.13(0.56-2.29)), P = 0.7
conclusionMTRR A66G increases susceptibly for recurrent pregnancy loss among Egyptian women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39249145What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.