Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39248660›Full record

ReviewJMIR public health and surveillance2024

Digital Competencies and Training Approaches to Enhance the Capacity of Practitioners to Support the Digital Transformation of Public Health: Rapid Review of Current Recommendations.

Swathi Ramachandran, Hsiu-Ju Chang, Catherine Worthington, Andre Kushniruk, Francisco Ibáñez-Carrasco, Hugh Davies, Geoffrey McKee, Adalsteinn Brown, Mark Gilbert, Ihoghosa Iyamu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Swathi RamachandranClinical Prevention Services, British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7448-4031
Hsiu-Ju ChangClinical Prevention Services, British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0369-2407
Catherine WorthingtonSchool of Public Health and Social Policy, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3075-8229
Andre KushnirukSchool of Health Information Science, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2557-9288
Francisco Ibáñez-CarrascoDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3667-6411
Hugh DaviesSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8258-6890
Geoffrey McKeeSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0329-2454
Adalsteinn BrownDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4792-5938
Mark Gilbert *Clinical Prevention Services, British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5978-6843
Ihoghosa Iyamu *Clinical Prevention Services, British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0271-9468

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted gaps in the public health workforce's capacity to deploy digital technologies while upholding ethical, social justice, and health equity principles. Existing public health competency frameworks have not been updated to reflect the prominent role digital technologies play in contemporary public health, and public health training institutions are seeking to integrate digital technologies in their curricula. Objective: As a first step in a multiphase study exploring recommendations for updates to public health competency frameworks within the Canadian public health context, we conducted a rapid review of literature aiming to identify recommendations for digital competencies, training approaches, and inter- or transdisciplinary partnerships that can enhance public health practitioners' capacity to support the digital transformation of public health. Methods: Following the World Health Organization's (2017) guidelines for rapid reviews, a systematic search was conducted on Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), and Web of Science for peer-reviewed articles. We also searched Google Scholar and various public health agency and public health association websites for gray literature using search terms related to public health, digital health, practice competencies, and training approaches. We included articles with explicit practice competencies and training recommendations related to digital technologies among public health practitioners published between January 2010 and December 2022. We excluded articles describing these concepts in passing or from a solely clinical perspective. Results: Our search returned 2023 titles and abstracts, of which only 12 studies met the inclusion criteria. We found recommendations for new competencies to enable public health practitioners to appropriately use digital technologies that cut across all existing categories of the core competencies for public health framework of the Public Health Agency of Canada. We also identified a new competency category related to data, data systems management, and governance. Training approaches identified include adapted degree-awarding programs like combined public health and informatics or data science degree programs and ongoing professional certifications with integration of practice-based learning in multi- and interdisciplinary training. Disciplines suggested as important to facilitate practice competency and training recommendations included public health, public health informatics, data, information and computer sciences, biostatistics, health communication, and business. Conclusions: Despite the growth of digital technologies in public health, recommendations about practice competencies and training approaches necessary to effectively support the digital transformation of public health remain limited in the literature. Where available, evidence suggests the workforce requires new competencies that cut across and extend existing public health competencies, including new competencies related to the use and protection of new digital data sources, alongside facilitating health communication and promotion functions using digital media. Recommendations also emphasize the need for training approaches that focus on interdisciplinarity through adapted degree-awarding public health training programs and ongoing professional development.

Indexed as

COVID-19Digital TechnologyPublic HealthCanadaHumansPandemicsProfessional Competencebest practicecompetenciescompetencycontinuing educationdigital healthdigital public healthdigital transformationdigital transformationsguidelineguidelinespractitionerpractitionerspublic healthpublic health workforcerapid reviewrapid reviewsrecommendationrecommendationsreview methodologyreview methodsskillskillssynthesistrainingtraining and practice recommendationsworkerworkersworkforce

Identifiers

PMID39248660
PMCPMC11403915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.