Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39248511›Full record

ArticleJournal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing2025

Machine learning methods to discover hidden patterns in well-being and resilience for healthy aging.

Robin R Austin, Ratchada Jantraporn, Martin Michalowski, Jenna Marquard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Machine learning methods to discover hidden patterns in well-being and resilience for healthy aging.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Robin R AustinSchool of Nursing, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1993-4623
Ratchada JantrapornSchool of Nursing, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6815-7958
Martin MichalowskiSchool of Nursing, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Jenna MarquardSchool of Nursing, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

Funding

Technology Identification and Training CoreP30AG073105 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DEMIRIS, GEORGE, KARLAWISH, JASON H · 2021 to 2025
$21.2M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG073105
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA whole person approach to healthy aging can provide insight into social factors that may be critical. Digital technologies, such as mobile health (mHealth) applications, hold promise to provide novel insights for healthy aging and the ability to collect data between clinical care visits. Machine learning/artificial intelligence methods have the potential to uncover insights into healthy aging. Nurses and nurse informaticians have a unique lens to shape the future use of this technology.

methodsThe purpose of this research was to apply machine learning methods to MyStrengths+MyHealth de-identified data (N = 988) for adults 45 years of age and older. An exploratory data analysis process guided this work.

resultsOverall (n = 988), the average Strength was 66.1% (SD = 5.1), average Challenges 66.5% (SD = 7.5), and average Needs 60.06% (SD = 3.1). There was a significant difference between Strengths and Needs (p < 0.001), between Challenges and Needs (p < 0.001), and no significant differences between average Strengths and Challenges. Four concept groups were identified from the data (Thinking, Moving, Emotions, and Sleeping). The Thinking group had the most statistically significant challenges (11) associated with having at least one Thinking Challenge and the highest average Strengths (66.5%) and Needs (83.6%) compared to the other groups.

conclusionThis retrospective analysis applied machine learning methods to de-identified whole person health resilience data from the MSMH application. Adults 45 and older had many Strengths despite numerous Challenges and Needs. The Thinking group had the highest Strengths, Challenges, and Needs, which aligns with the literature and highlights the co-occurring health challenges experienced by this group. Machine learning methods applied to consumer health data identify unique insights applicable to specific conditions (e.g., cognitive) and healthy aging. The next steps involve testing personalized interventions with nurses leading artificial intelligence integration into clinical care.

Indexed as

Healthy AgingMachine LearningResilience, PsychologicalAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTelemedicineconsumer‐generated health datamachine learningresiliencewhole person health

Identifiers

PMID39248511
PMCPMC11771560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.