ArticleEpilepsia open2024
The long odyssey for the DEE-CDKL5 diagnosis: A call for action.
Article in Epilepsia open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The long odyssey for the DEE-CDKL5 diagnosis: A call for action.Epilepsia open · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aims to determine the current state of CDD diagnosis and epilepsy treatment in an upper-middle-income country.
methodsForty-seven families of the Brazilian CDD Association were invited to participate in an online survey to gather information about the diagnosis and treatment of epilepsy.
resultsForty-three families (91.5%) of unrelated patients with confirmed genetic diagnosis of CDD participated. The median age was 7 years (ranging from 1.3-25 years) and the male: female ratio was 1:6. Early and severe epilepsy started during infancy in 74.4%. Seizures occurred daily in 61.9% and 83.7% had clusters of seizures. The mean age of diagnosis was 3.3 years (ranging from 37 days to 16 years), and younger patients had an earlier diagnosis (p < 0.001). Patients were seen by an average of 4.4 physicians (1-15) before the diagnosis. The most relevant obstacles to genetic testing were cost (55.8%) and late requests by physicians (27.9%). At the moment of the assessment, patients received a mean of 3.6 ASMs/day (ranging from 1 to 5). Thirty-four (79.1%) caregivers reported side effects throughout life, including life-threatening events in 16.3%. SIGNIFICANCE: Based on our findings, a sense of urgency for genetic assessment implementation is evident since the delay in the diagnosis with unnecessary use of resources and excessive polytherapy with serious side effects cause a higher burden to the healthcare system, caregivers, and patients. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: In this study, we assessed the diagnosis and treatment of patients with genetically confirmed DEE-CDKL5 from the Brazilian Association of CDD with an online survey. Caregivers reported a long delay in the diagnosis associated with cost and late referral to genetic testing, considered the last resource for one-third of the patients. Patients received a high number of ASM, mainly under polytherapy, with serious side effects. Although it is promising that younger patients received earlier diagnosis, public policies for genetic testing are needed to improve CDD patients' care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.