Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39248126›Full record

ArticleDiagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey)2025

Artificial intelligence system for identification of overlooked lung metastasis in abdominopelvic computed tomography scans of patients with malignancy.

Hye Soo Cho, Eui Jin Hwang, Jaeyoun Yi, Boorym Choi, Chang Min Park

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hye Soo ChoSeoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8792-2363
Eui Jin HwangSeoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3697-5542
Jaeyoun YiCoreline Soft Inc., Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-7664-9493
Boorym ChoiCoreline Soft Inc., Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0009-0001-5409-7114
Chang Min ParkSeoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1884-3738

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to evaluate whether an artificial intelligence (AI) system can identify basal lung metastatic nodules examined using abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) that were initially overlooked by radiologists.

methodsWe retrospectively included abdominopelvic CT images with the following inclusion criteria: a) CT images from patients with solid organ malignancies between March 1 and March 31, 2019, in a single institution; and b) abdominal CT images interpreted as negative for basal lung metastases. Reference standards for diagnosis of lung metastases were confirmed by reviewing medical records and subsequent CT images. An AI system that could automatically detect lung nodules on CT images was applied retrospectively. A radiologist reviewed the AI detection results to classify them as lesions with the possibility of metastasis or clearly benign. The performance of the initial AI results and the radiologist's review of the AI results were evaluated using patient-level and lesion-level sensitivities, false-positive rates, and the number of false-positive lesions per patient.

resultsA total of 878 patients (580 men; mean age, 63 years) were included, with overlooked basal lung metastases confirmed in 13 patients (1.5%). The AI exhibited an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve value of 0.911 for the identification of overlooked basal lung metastases. Patient- and lesion-level sensitivities of the AI system ranged from 69.2% to 92.3% and 46.2% to 92.3%, respectively. After a radiologist reviewed the AI results, the sensitivity remained unchanged. The false-positive rate and number of false-positive lesions per patient ranged from 5.8% to 27.6% and 0.1% to 0.5%, respectively. Radiologist reviews significantly reduced the false-positive rate (2.4%-12.6%; all

conclusionThe AI system could accurately identify basal lung metastases detected in abdominopelvic CT images that were overlooked by radiologists, suggesting its potential as a tool for radiologist interpretation. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The AI system can identify missed basal lung lesions in abdominopelvic CT scans in patients with malignancy, providing feedback to radiologists, which can reduce the risk of missing basal lung metastasis.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceLung NeoplasmsTomography, X-Ray ComputedAbdomenAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansLungMaleMiddle AgedPelvisRadiography, AbdominalRetrospective StudiesROC CurveArtificial intelligencecomputed tomographyimage analysismetastasisradiology

Identifiers

PMID39248126
PMCPMC11880870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.