ArticleDiagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey)2025
Artificial intelligence system for identification of overlooked lung metastasis in abdominopelvic computed tomography scans of patients with malignancy.
Article in Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Missed Incidental Lung Cancer on Neck CT: Determinants and Impact on Diagnostic Delay and Stage Shift.Korean journal of radiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to evaluate whether an artificial intelligence (AI) system can identify basal lung metastatic nodules examined using abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) that were initially overlooked by radiologists.
methodsWe retrospectively included abdominopelvic CT images with the following inclusion criteria: a) CT images from patients with solid organ malignancies between March 1 and March 31, 2019, in a single institution; and b) abdominal CT images interpreted as negative for basal lung metastases. Reference standards for diagnosis of lung metastases were confirmed by reviewing medical records and subsequent CT images. An AI system that could automatically detect lung nodules on CT images was applied retrospectively. A radiologist reviewed the AI detection results to classify them as lesions with the possibility of metastasis or clearly benign. The performance of the initial AI results and the radiologist's review of the AI results were evaluated using patient-level and lesion-level sensitivities, false-positive rates, and the number of false-positive lesions per patient.
resultsA total of 878 patients (580 men; mean age, 63 years) were included, with overlooked basal lung metastases confirmed in 13 patients (1.5%). The AI exhibited an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve value of 0.911 for the identification of overlooked basal lung metastases. Patient- and lesion-level sensitivities of the AI system ranged from 69.2% to 92.3% and 46.2% to 92.3%, respectively. After a radiologist reviewed the AI results, the sensitivity remained unchanged. The false-positive rate and number of false-positive lesions per patient ranged from 5.8% to 27.6% and 0.1% to 0.5%, respectively. Radiologist reviews significantly reduced the false-positive rate (2.4%-12.6%; all
conclusionThe AI system could accurately identify basal lung metastases detected in abdominopelvic CT images that were overlooked by radiologists, suggesting its potential as a tool for radiologist interpretation. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The AI system can identify missed basal lung lesions in abdominopelvic CT scans in patients with malignancy, providing feedback to radiologists, which can reduce the risk of missing basal lung metastasis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.