ArticleAdvanced materials technologies2024
Investigation of 3D Printed Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Crimping Behavior.
Article in Advanced materials technologies, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Auxetic Stents as a Next Generation Solution for Vascular Diseases-A Review.Cardiovascular engineering and technology · 2026Review
- Light-Based 3D Printing of Polyesters: From Synthesis to Fabrication.Chemical reviews · 2026Review
- A novel paclitaxel eluting bioresorbable vascular stent with a super flexible stent structure and round cross section struts fabricated using 3D printing technology with a rotating platform.Regenerative biomaterials · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The rise in additive manufacturing (AM) offers myriad opportunities for 3D-printed polymeric vascular scaffolds, such as customization and on-the-spot manufacturing,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.