ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2024
Reproductive tract complication risks following
Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prevalence of Five Clinically Relevant Genital Microorganisms Among Women in South America, 2014-2024: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Pooled it
- Wnt/Notch Crosstalk Promotes Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition DuringMicroorganisms · 2026Article
- Impact of reduced chlamydia testing on STI testing and provider preferences in the Netherlands: an experimental vignette study.Sexually transmitted infections · 2026Article
- Worldwide prevalence ofNew microbes and new infections · 2026Review
- Mechanisms, management and prevention of anorectal sexually transmitted infections.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2026Review
- Article
- An Exploratory In Silico Analysis ofCancers · 2026Article
- Evaluating a new partner management strategy for bacterial sexually transmitted infections after a change in 2020 in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 2017 to 2023.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2026Article
- Causal effects of oral microbiome traits on female reproductive diseases: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study.BMC women's health · 2026Article
- Post-exposure prophylaxis with antibiotics to prevent sexually transmitted infections.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026Article
- Sexually Transmitted Infection Treatment Rates Among Pregnant vs Nonpregnant Patients in Emergency Departments.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Article
- Prostatitis-Related Male Infertility: From Inflammation and Dysbiosis to Sperm DNA Damage.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
- Global, Regional, and National Burden of Female Infertility Attributable to Chlamydia Infections, 1990-2023: An Analysis Based on the Global Burden of Disease Study 2023.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Comparative Study of the Clinical Characteristics of Patients With Sexually Transmitted Infections Diagnosed by Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests.Journal of Korean medical science · 2025Article
- Invariant and Diverse NKT Cells Regulate Bacterial Clearance and Pathology in Chlamydial Genital Tract Infection in Mice.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Examining the prevalence of reproductive tract infections (RTIs) and their correlation with knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP): a cross-sectional study among university-affiliated women.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Estimated effect of reduced asymptomatic testing on missedThe Lancet regional health. Europe · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The clinical and public health relevance of widespread testing for asymptomatic Methods: A cohort of 5704 reproductive-age women recruited from a chlamydia screening study was followed for up to 14 years. Chlamydia positivity was determined using screening polymerase chain reaction test results, self-reported diagnoses (with/without symptoms), and chlamydia Immunoglobulin G antibodies. Outcome data (pregnancies, pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), ectopic pregnancy, and tubal factor infertility) were collected through self-completed questionnaires. Cox regression calculated adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) with confidence intervals (CI) to compare outcomes between time-updated chlamydia groups since sexual debut. Findings: During 104,612 person-years, 2103 (36.9%) women were chlamydia-positive and 3692 women (64.7%) had been pregnant at least once. Risks for PID, ectopic pregnancy and tubal factor infertility were 1.62 (95% CI 1.20-2.17), 1.84 (95% CI 1.14-2.95) and 2.75 (95% CI 1.53-4.94), compared to chlamydia-negatives. aHRs for PID after symptomatic and asymptomatic infections were 2.29 (95% CI 1.62-3.25) and 1.06 (95% CI 0.66-1.69), respectively. Incidence of PID, ectopic pregnancy and tubal factor infertility after symptomatic chlamydia infection remained low with rates per 1000 person-years of 5.8, 1.9, and 1.8, respectively. Interpretation: We found a significantly higher risk of PID, ectopic pregnancy and tubal factor infertility in chlamydia-positive women compared to chlamydia-negative women, although the overall incidence rates of complications remained low. Symptomatic, but not asymptomatic, chlamydia infections were associated with PID risk, suggesting the largest disease burden of complications is in this group. Funding: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMW Netherlands) and Research Funding from the Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sports.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.