ArticleFrontiers in medical technology2024
Detection and counting of
Article in Frontiers in medical technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Antileishmanial Activity of Bioactive Compounds Obtained fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Pooled it
- AIR-LEISH: A Dataset of Giemsa-Stained Microscopy Images for AI-based Leishmania amastigotes Detection.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Molecular profiling and risk factors assessment of cutaneous leishmaniasis in an expanding endemic focus of Punjab, Pakistan.Parasitology research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Problem: Leishmaniasis is a disease caused by protozoan parasites of the genus Objectives: To develop a computational system that facilitates the detection and counting of amastigotes in microscopy images obtained from Methodology: Segmentation of objects in the microscope image that might be Results and discussion: The results were evaluated in terms of sensitivity, precision, and the F-measure and suggested a favorable effectiveness of the proposed method. Conclusions: This system can help researchers by allowing large volumes of images of amastigotes to be counted using an automatic image analysis technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.