ReviewTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology2024
Artificial intelligence and machine learning technologies in ulcerative colitis.
Review in Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence detection of endoscopic moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis: a novel tool to enhance clinical trial recruitment.iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights · 2026Article
- Lessons from extended induction and practical evidence for improving tofacitinib therapy in ulcerative colitis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Recent Advances in Molecular Targeted Therapy for Inflammatory Bowel Disease.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2026Review
- Performance of Novel Inflammatory Bowel Disease-Specific Models for Risk Adjustment.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2026Article
- Comprehensive analysis of a lipid metabolism-related gene signature for ulcerative colitis.Translational pediatrics · 2025Article
- FastColitisDetector-XAI: An efficient AI model utilizing sparse Autoencoder with explainable AI for ulcerative colitis diagnosis.MethodsX · 2025Article
- Editorial for the Special Issue "Advances in Medical Image Processing, Segmentation, and Classification".Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Interest in artificial intelligence (AI) applications for ulcerative colitis (UC) has grown tremendously in recent years. In the past 5 years, there have been over 80 studies focused on machine learning (ML) tools to address a wide range of clinical problems in UC, including diagnosis, prognosis, identification of new UC biomarkers, monitoring of disease activity, and prediction of complications. AI classifiers such as random forest, support vector machines, neural networks, and logistic regression models have been used to model UC clinical outcomes using molecular (transcriptomic) and clinical (electronic health record and laboratory) datasets with relatively high performance (accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity). Application of ML algorithms such as computer vision, guided image filtering, and convolutional neural networks have also been utilized to analyze large and high-dimensional imaging datasets such as endoscopic, histologic, and radiological images for UC diagnosis and prediction of complications (post-surgical complications, colorectal cancer). Incorporation of these ML tools to guide and optimize UC clinical practice is promising but will require large, high-quality validation studies that overcome the risk of bias as well as consider cost-effectiveness compared to standard of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.