ArticleGastroenterology research2024
Clinical Efficacy of Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Combined With Percutaneous Microwave Coagulation Therapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Article in Gastroenterology research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma at specific anatomic sites of the liver: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Pooled it
- Arterial and biliary complications after transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma.World journal of clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma at specific anatomic sites of the liver: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- Combination of vascular surgery with novel vascular targeting agents as cancer therapeutics.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The aim of the study was to explore the clinical efficacy of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with percutaneous microwave coagulation therapy (PMCT) for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: Eighty-three advanced HCC patients were divided into the experimental group (TACE + PMCT, 57 cases) and the control group (TACE alone, 26 cases). They received TACE treatment first, and computed tomography (CT) or hepatic artery angiography was performed 3 - 4 weeks after each treatment. Based on the comprehensive evaluation of iodine oil deficiency, fistula recanalization, residual lesions, and lesion progression, TACE or PMCT treatment was selectively performed, and three consecutive treatments were considered as one treatment cycle. Results: The experimental group had a response rate (RR) of 49.1%, and the control group had a RR of 38.4%. The reduction rate of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) in the experimental group was significantly higher than the control group (P < 0.05). The cumulative survival rates in the experimental at 1-, 1.5-, and 2-year post-treatment were higher than the control group. The cumulative recurrence and metastasis rates in the experimental at 1.5-, and 2-year post-treatment were significantly lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). In addition, there were no significant differences in treatment-related complications in the two groups. Conclusions: The combined treatment of TACE and PMCT for advanced HCC is a safe, feasible, and effective treatment method, prolonging the survival time, and reducing the recurrence and metastasis rate, without increased toxic and side effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.