Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39247673›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2024

MRI scan with the "feed and wrap" technique and with an optimized anesthesia protocol: a retrospective analysis of a single-center experience.

Giulia Moltoni, Giulia Lucignani, Stefania Sgrò, Alessia Guarnera, Maria Camilla Rossi Espagnet, Francesco Dellepiane, Chiara Carducci, Stefano Liberi, Elisabetta Iacoella, Giuliana Evangelisti and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Giulia MoltoniFunctional and Interventional Neuroradiology Unit, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Giulia LucignaniFunctional and Interventional Neuroradiology Unit, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Stefania SgròDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Alessia GuarneraFunctional and Interventional Neuroradiology Unit, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Maria Camilla Rossi EspagnetFunctional and Interventional Neuroradiology Unit, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Francesco DellepianeFunctional and Interventional Neuroradiology Unit, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Chiara CarducciFunctional and Interventional Neuroradiology Unit, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Stefano LiberiFunctional and Interventional Neuroradiology Unit, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Elisabetta IacoellaDepartment of Imaging, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Giuliana EvangelistiDepartment of Imaging, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Anna ContiniNuclear Medicine and Advanced Oncological Imaging Unit, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Francesca CampiNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital-IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Immacolata SavareseNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital-IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Carlo GandolfoFunctional and Interventional Neuroradiology Unit, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Daniela LongoFunctional and Interventional Neuroradiology Unit, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: MRI examinations in the pediatric population require acquiring motionless images in the safest possible manner. At our institute, we have developed a protocol called "Good Practice" aimed at avoiding anesthesia in newborns and infants through the use of the "feed and wrap" technique, as well as preventing hospitalization for older children requiring anesthesia with an optimized sedation protocol. We evaluated this protocol in terms of patient safety, imaging quality, and parental satisfaction. Materials and methods: Patient data were collected retrospectively. In the feed and wrap group, image quality and the necessity of repeating the examination were evaluated. In the optimized anesthesiologic protocol group, various parameters were analyzed to assess the safety of the protocol. Parental satisfaction was determined through a questionnaire. Results: A total of 132 patients were included, with 82 undergoing the feed and wrap technique and 50 receiving the optimized anesthesiologic protocol. In the feed and wrap group, images were classified as follows: 4.87% poor, 18.29% sufficient, 37.80% good, and 39.92% excellent. In only 2 cases a new MRI examination was required. In the optimized anesthesiologic protocol group, no adverse effects were observed, and no post-anesthesia hospitalizations were needed. 100% of parents of babies examined with the feed and wrap technique rated it as excellent. Furthermore, 85.6% of parents considered the optimized anesthesiologic protocol excellent, and 13.6% rated it as good. Conclusion: At our institute, the feed and wrap technique proved to be effective in obtaining high-quality images. Anesthesia using propofol showed no adverse effects and proved to be successful in avoiding hospitalization. Parents expressed relief at the avoidance of anesthesia and hospitalization for their children.

Indexed as

anesthesiachildrenfeed and wrapMRInewborn

Identifiers

PMID39247673
PMCPMC11377234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.